Commentary

School board meetings are now routinely out of control. But can it be stopped?

Religious right activists turned out to storm a school board meeting to protest calling students by their name and demand pupils not be taught something that isn't offered in the district.
Religious right activists turned out to storm a school board meeting to protest calling students by their name and demand pupils not be taught something that isn't offered in the district. Photo: Screenshot

For the longest time, comment periods at public meetings allowed average citizens to speak their minds about issues that were important to them. Sure, there were always some cranks who were there to complain about some imagined slight or malfeasance, but for the most part, the comment period was a somewhat sleepy example of democracy in action.

Not anymore. And one of the primary reasons is LGBTQ+ issues in schools.

In the wake of numerous rowdy, vicious, and even violent outbursts during public meetings, officials are grappling with controlling public comment periods, even as free speech advocates warn that doing so could violate First Amendment rights. Meanwhile, the meetings have become increasingly unsafe for LGBTQ+ people and their supporters, particularly school board members, who find themselves the target of attacks.

Since the start of the current school year alone, public comment periods at school board meetings have descended into chaos and hateful LGBTQ+ rhetoric at numerous places.

Perhaps the most notorious example of school board chaos happened in Loudon County, VA, in July 2021, when right-wing Christians staged a meltdown to protest policy to protect trans students. The event grew so disruptive that police were called and one man was arrested.  As it turns out, that was just the start of a series of protests across the state that month.

Now anti-LGBTQ+ right-wingers – not all of whom are parents – are such a feature at school board meetings that disruptions are almost taken for granted.

The question is, can elected officials do anything to stop them? Civil liberties advocates say that people have a right to express their opinion, no matter how obnoxious.

“What does rude mean? What does courteous mean?” attorney Ruth Bourquin of the ACLU of Massachusetts told the Washington Post. The ACLU filed a brief supporting a challenge to the town of Southborough’s requirement that speakers refrain from “rude, personal or slanderous remarks.”

The problem, of course, is that the rudeness isn’t directed solely at the board members. It’s also directed at the LGBTQ+ community and students in particular. The school board meetings foster an atmosphere of hate that inevitably spills over into the school community.

Meanwhile, the enraged anti-LGBTQ+ crowds at the board meetings aren’t just there to express their opinions. They teeter dangerously on the edge of a mob, screaming threats at school board members. That’s a version of democracy that, thankfully, is still not taught in schools.

 

Don't forget to share:

Support vital LGBTQ+ journalism

Reader contributions help keep LGBTQ Nation free, so that queer people get the news they need, with stories that mainstream media often leaves out. Can you contribute today?

Cancel anytime · Proudly LGBTQ+ owned and operated

George Santos accused of blatant racist and antisemitic comments in resurfaced Facebook post

Previous article

Sam Smith says they were “spat at” on the street for being non-binary

Next article