Commentary

Nothing screams patriotism like banning peaceful protests

A football player takes a knee before the game
Photo: Shutterstock

In an apparent Hail Mary pass, the National Football League owners tossed out their new national anthem policy unanimously approved by team “owners,” with one abstention by San Francisco 49ers owner, Jed York.

The terms of the policy include the requirement that players stand when on the field during the performance of the anthem, though they have the option of remaining in the locker room.

The owners should be ruled “off sides” by agreeing to any policy without input and expressed consent from the NFL Players’ Union.

It comes in the context of declining ticket sales and anger by some fans around the swirling controversy, flamed by Donald Trump to a “white”-hot intensity, over Colin Kaepernick’s decision to take a knee during the National Anthem to highlight deadly police actions taken against unarmed black men.

“Wouldn’t you love to see one of these NFL owners, when somebody disrespects our flag, to say, ‘Get that son of a bitch off the field right now, out, he’s fired. HE’S FIRED!’” shouted Trump last year to the loud applause of his rally audience.

“You know, some owner is gonna do that… [These owners are] friends of mine, many of them… They’ll be the most popular person in the country.”

Donald Trump’s attacks on primarily black NFL players like Colin Kaepernick and several others for asserting their First Amendment rights clearly indicates that he does not understand Constitutional guarantees of freedom of speech, expression, and association.

The 50 stars and 13 strips on our flag of red, white, and blue represent a collective image of the United States of America.

While the United States symbolizes a beautiful notion founded on a noble concept and an enduring vision, it remains a work in process. It is progressing but not yet reaching that concept.

Possibly what separates the patriot from the nationalist is that the patriot understands and witnesses the gap between the reality and the promise of their country and its people. The nationalist, though, is often not aware that a gap even exists between the potential and the reality.

A true patriot is a person who, indeed, loves one’s country, but also one who sees the way things are, and one who attempts to make change for the better. A patriot also views other countries with respect and admiration, as valued members of an interconnected world community.

By refusing to stand, place one’s hand over one’s heart, remove hats, and sing as the national anthem is performed, people are raising important questions concerning what it means to be patriotic and an active participant in our democratic process.

During the Vietnam War era, those who challenged the war were met with signs and bumper stickers demanding: “America, love it or leave it.” The response to this was “American, change it or lose it.”

A patriot sees things the way they are and tries to make them better. Fascist dictatorial regimes demand mindless uncritical allegiance and mandate dire consequences for dissenters.

It is arrogant at best for members of dominant groups and those in power to believe they have the right to dictate conditions by which people protest their concerns. Looking back on our history, how well did that work for British King George III?

NFL fans should have far greater interest in the short- and long-term affects of players who perennially take severe blows to the head than by players who occasionally take a knee to the ground. Forced expressions of nationalism go against what the flag symbolizes and what our brave service members risk their lives to protect.

How many people who vehemently advocate for the standing of the Star Spangled Banner or affix flags to porches and and pickup trucks take the time to vote?

How many of them volunteer to remove litter from parks or serve meals at soup kitchens? How many stay current on issues, laws, and policies affecting their communities and their nation?

And how many of them truly understand the histories, the peoples, the governmental and economic systems, the traditions, the languages – for that matter, the actual locations – of many other countries across the planet in contexts other than having to learn about these nations when international tensions arise?

As we all have the freedom to pray and observe or not observe religious practices within our private spaces, so too, we must have the freedom to determine how we express our patriotic impulses.

Don't forget to share:

Support vital LGBTQ+ journalism

Reader contributions help keep LGBTQ Nation free, so that queer people get the news they need, with stories that mainstream media often leaves out. Can you contribute today?

Cancel anytime · Proudly LGBTQ+ owned and operated

Pride in Pictures 1977-78: Anita’s wave of hate created our strength in numbers

Previous article

Transgender woman shot & killed by homeless person she was trying to assist

Next article