News

Is past opposition to LGBTQ rights now the third-rail for Democrats?

Is past opposition to LGBTQ rights now the third-rail for Democrats?
Tulsi GabbardPhoto: Tulsi Gabbard's Facebook page

Tulsi Gabbard has a problem and she knows it. Within a week of the Hawaii Congresswoman launching her presidential campaign, she had to issue not one, but two apologies.

The initial statement obviously didn’t cut it, so Gabbard issued a video apologizing for her past anti-LGBTQ comments.

“In my past, I said and believed things that were wrong, and worse, they were hurtful to people in the LGBTQ community and to their loved ones,” Gabbard said. “I’m deeply sorry for having said them. My views have changed significantly since then, and my record in Congress over the last six years reflects what is in my heart.”

Gabbard goes on to talk about growing up in a socially conservative household, headed by her father, Mike Gabbard, who successfully led the fight to stop marriage equality in Hawaii in the 1990s. She also cites her own experience as an example that people can change for the better.

What Gabbard is running into is the reality of Democratic party politics. It’s no longer acceptable for a high-profile Democrat to be nebulously supportive of LGBTQ rights. You better have a strong track record, and if not, you better be able to explain quickly how you’ve changed.

Of course, Gabbard is an extreme case. She was talking about LGBTQ rights the same way that Franklin Graham or Tony Perkins would. She railed against “homosexual extremists” and once worked for a group that touted conversion therapy.

That stance is far more radical than that of a standard-issue moderate Democrat who may have favored civil unions instead of marriage.

Still, the lesson for other candidates is clear: if you have anything in your past that doesn’t pass 2019 standards of support for LGBTQ rights, you better get ahead of it when you announce.

Gabbard’s big mistake was to let journalists call out her past remarks for her. That left her on the defensive and scrambling to respond.

Openly gay Rep. Sean Maloney provided some cover as the controversy grew by offering words of support.

“I also understand how important it is that we encourage people to admit their error, grow and evolve, as much of the country has done over the last two decades,” Maloney said. “That is exactly what Tulsi Gabbard has done. She recognized the fault in her past views and the pain she was causing, and she has apologized.”

Gabbard needs that kind of cover, not just for her presidential campaign but to continue as a player in Democratic politics.

If you think that failure to support LGBTQ rights isn’t a third rail for Democratic candidates who want to be president, consider this: Gabbard has taken plenty of other problematic stands, starting with rhetoric about Islam that sounds a lot like the way Republican hawks talk.

In 2015, for example, she complained that President Obama refused “to recognize who our enemy is…. We have to recognize that this is about radical Islam.” As a result, Gabbard has been a fixture on Fox News, especially Tucker Carlson’s show. (Carlson has also leapt to Gabbard’s defense.)

Her position on Syria is far outside the party mainstream. She has been supportive of Russians intervention on the ongoing crisis there and even met with Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad, who has engaged in chemical warfare and endless atrocities against his own people. 

So it’s interesting, to say the least, that with such a checkered record Gabbard vulnerable spot has been LGBTQ issues. That’s a sign of how much the party has decided that the community is a key component of its base.

For the 2020 campaign, that’s good news. The distinction between Trump and whoever his Democratic opponent is will be extra sharp.

The big challenge for Democrats–Gabbard included–will be what they will be able to deliver even if they win.

 

A shockingly high number of nonbinary people are denied health care in the United States

Previous article

Watch this young boy explain the importance of Martin Luther King’s life & death

Next article