The bill by Assemblyman Mark Stone, a Democrat from Monterey Bay, clarifies state law on peremptory challenges that are used to remove prospective jurors during jury selection.
It also bars using peremptory challenges based on a juror’s disability, ethnic group or genetic information.
AB87 says a challenge can’t be used simply because a lawyer assumes that a prospective juror would be biased because he or she has the characteristics of another gender.
Article continues belowThe measure passed without debate on a 63-2 vote Thursday. It now goes to the Senate.
It already is illegal to use the challenges because of race, religion, sex, national origin, or sexual orientation.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.