Fight or flee? The GOP grapples with same-sex marriage

Fight or flee? The GOP grapples with same-sex marriage
Mike Huckabee
Mike Huckabee
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court’s gay marriage decision has reignited a debate inside the GOP that many Republican leaders hoped to avoid ahead of the 2016 presidential contest. The court’s decision Monday to reject appeals from five states that sought to prohibit same-sex marriage pits the GOP’s pragmatic wing eager to move past the divisive social issue against religious conservatives – a vocal minority that vowed to redouble its efforts and punish those unwilling to join them. Describing the decision as “judicial activism at its worst,” Texas Sen. Ted Cruz on Tuesday renewed his pledge to introduce a constitutional amendment that would limit the court’s ability to strike down the remaining state laws blocking gays and lesbians from marrying. “We’re seeing right now an assault on traditional marriage,” he added. Among the GOP’s crowded 2016 class, only a handful of potential contenders – Cruz and former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, among them – aggressively criticized the court’s decision. Both will need support from religious conservatives to fuel a potential presidential bid. “It is shocking that many elected officials, attorneys and judges think that a court ruling is the ‘final word,'” Huckabee said. “It most certainly is not.”

Article continues below

The pair was in the minority among possible GOP presidential hopefuls. High-profile Republican governors from Wisconsin to Indiana suggested the debate was over – in their states, at least. “For us, it’s over in Wisconsin,” said Republican Gov. Scott Walker, whose state’s appeal was among those the court declined. “To me, I’d rather be talking in the future now more about our jobs plan and our plan for the future of the state,” Walker continued. “I think that’s what matters to the kids. It’s not this issue.” The court’s decision effectively raises the number of states where same-sex marriage is legal from 19 to 30, meaning as many as 60 percent of Americans now live in states where gay and lesbian people can marry.
A day after the high court’s decision, a federal appeals court in San Francisco on Tuesday struck down gay marriage bans in a ruling that could soon allow gay and lesbian couples to wed in five more states. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals invalidated bans in Idaho and Nevada, and the ruling might well extend to three other states in the 9th Circuit that do not permit same-sex couples to marry: Alaska, Arizona and Montana. AP-marriage-map A decade ago, President George W. Bush won re-election in part by supporting ballot initiatives in several states seeking a constitutional ban on gay marriage, boosting turnout among motivated conservative voters. Support for legal same-sex marriage has grown swiftly in the years since, and several polls have found that majorities of Americans are in favor of legal recognition for gay marriages. But for religious conservatives who hold outsized influence in Republican presidential contests in the early voting states of Iowa and South Carolina, the issue resonates. “If you’re a candidate for president who refuses to oppose homosexual marriage, I don’t see how you get elected,” said Steve Scheffler, a Republican national committeeman from Iowa. “You’re going to get clobbered.” Ralph Reed, chairman of the Faith and Freedom Coalition, issued a warning for anyone eyeing the 2016 presidential contest: “There will be no avoiding this issue.” That’s exactly what some Republicans contemplating presidential bids would like to do. New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie pleaded ignorance when asked about the court’s decision Monday at a campaign appearance in Connecticut. “I haven’t had a chance to read it,” said Christie, who drew fire from cultural conservatives last year when he declined to appeal a court ruling legalizing gay marriage in his state. “I don’t give comments based on headlines.”

U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, at the 2014 Values Voter Summit in Washington, D.C.
U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, at the 2014 Values Voter Summit in Washington, D.C. AP

Indiana Gov. Mike Pence said in a statement he was disappointed by the ruling, adding that while he believes “in the importance of traditional marriage,” he would abide by the rule of law.

“People are free to disagree with court decisions but we are not free to disobey them,” he said.

At an event in Washington, Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, whose state has an active case that was not among those considered Monday by the Supreme Court, had a muted reaction.

“I continue to believe in traditional marriage, but the ball’s certainly in the court’s court,” he said.

Article continues below

Other would-be Republican White House candidates have demonstrated how tricky the politics of gay marriage can be.

Florida Sen. Marco Rubio supports marriage between a man and a woman, but has urged tolerance for gay couples. He also spoke out in July about what he called a “growing intolerance” against people who oppose same-sex marriage.

Ohio Sen. Rob Portman announced his support for same-sex marriage in 2013. The senator’s son is gay.

© 2014, Associated Press, All Rights Reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Don't forget to share:

Support vital LGBTQ+ journalism

Reader contributions help keep LGBTQ Nation free, so that queer people get the news they need, with stories that mainstream media often leaves out. Can you contribute today?

Cancel anytime · Proudly LGBTQ+ owned and operated

Fischer: Gay marriage decision the ‘Roe v. Wade of sodomy based marriage’

Previous article

Mo. Catholic bishop speaks out against Springfield non-discrimination ordinance

Next article