Obama protections the Trump administration has rescinded (or hopes to)

Obama protections the Trump administration has rescinded (or hopes to)

Under Obama, anti-equality legislation–including the Defense of Marriage Act and Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell–was overturned while a number of protections were also enacted to fight discrimination.

Despite this, gay Republicans have dubbed Trump “the most pro-gay president in American history.”

Related: Voting deadlines, registration & what’s at stake for LGBTQ voters in 2020

However, here are just a few of those Obama-era rulings that Trump and his administration have rescinded since he took office in 2016.

1. Trans military policy executive orders

Obama (June 30, 2016): “Transgender Americans may serve openly and they can no longer be discharged or otherwise separated from the military just for being transgender.”

Trump (July 26, 2017): “The United States Government will not accept or allow transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. Military.”

2. Healthcare discrimination policy

Obama (Dec 22, 2016): The Affordable Care Act prohibits discrimination against “sex, gender identity, and sexual orientation” in health coverage and care.

Trump (June 12, 2020): Under the Affordable Care Act, “the plain meaning of the word ‘sex’ [is] male or female and as determined by biology.”

3. Education discrimination policy

Obama (December 1, 2014): Schools that receive federal funding must “treat transgender students consistent with their gender identity,” which includes bathroom usage.

Trump (Feb 22, 2017): The Departments of Justice and Education “will not rely on the views [previously] expressed.”

4. Marriage Equality

Obama (June 26, 2015): The justice department submits brief supporting marriage equality in the case Obergefell v. Hodges; The Supreme Court rules same-sex marriage legal in all 50 states, and Obama immediately calls it a “victory for America.”

Trump (Oct 5, 2020): Trump’s public opposition to same-sex marriage traces back to 2000 in an interview for The Advocate where he states, “I think the institution of marriage should be between a man and a woman.” In a recent dissent in the case of Kim Davis, the former Kentucky county clerk who refused to issue same-sex marriage licenses, Supreme Court Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas stated that the court’s 2015 decision to legalize same-sex marriage “will continue to have ruinous consequences for religious liberty.” Trump’s administration did not comment on the dissent or Davis’ case.

In her confirmation hearings, Trump’s third supreme court appointee Amy Coney Barrett indicated that Loving v. Virginia, the 1968 decision striking down bans on interracial marriage, should be considered an established precedent. However, she refuses an opportunity to say the same of Obergefell, leaving the future of marriage equality before the conservative majority an open question.

Don't forget to share:

Support vital LGBTQ+ journalism

Reader contributions help keep LGBTQ Nation free, so that queer people get the news they need, with stories that mainstream media often leaves out. Can you contribute today?

Cancel anytime · Proudly LGBTQ+ owned and operated

Five reasons why you can trust the polls this time & one reason to hedge your bets

Previous article

Pete Buttigieg rips into Donald Trump for leaving his supporters in the freezing cold

Next article