News (USA)

New York Post rejects marriage equality: ‘If we had a vote, it would be no’

New York Post rejects marriage equality: ‘If we had a vote, it would be no’

The New York Post on Tuesday published an editorial rejecting marriage equality, and said that “in the long run … society will be better served by retaining the traditional, time-tested definition of marriage.”

Sure, politics drives everything in Albany, but some topics properly are a matter between legislators, their constituents and their consciences.

We would include same-sex marriage on that list. […]

There is no denying that same-sex marriage could become law this year. This reflects a seismic shift in society’s attitudes on the issue — and a growing acceptance of gays in general.

Still, the question is vexing.

But if we had a vote, it would be no.

The editorial repeatedly cites “Professor” Robert P. George, who argues, “the state would be forced to view [traditional]-marriage supporters as bigots who make groundless and individual distinctions,” which would “undermine religious freedom and the rights of parents to direct the . . . upbringing of their children.”

George is a founder and Chairman Emeritus of the National Organization for Marriage (which the Post does not mention).

Don't forget to share:

Support vital LGBTQ+ journalism

Reader contributions help keep LGBTQ Nation free, so that queer people get the news they need, with stories that mainstream media often leaves out. Can you contribute today?

Cancel anytime · Proudly LGBTQ+ owned and operated

NY Assembly passes marriage equality bill; Senate undecided on allowing a vote

Previous article

Will New York state Senator Mark Grisanti decide marriage equality?

Next article