BERLIN — Gay rights campaigners won a victory over the German government Thursday as the country’s top court ruled that same-sex couples in civil unions should receive the same tax benefits as heterosexual married couples.
The Federal Constitutional Court in Karlsruhe ruled that treating the two forms of partnership differently for tax purposes violates the country’s guarantee of equal rights.
Chancellor Angela Merkel’s center-right government had long resisted granting the same tax benefits to gay couples in civil unions. Those unions – officially certified by a notary and carrying similar rights and duties to wedlock – are widely accepted by Germany’s gay community as equivalent to marriage.
Married couples in Germany are able to jointly declare their taxable incomes, which can significantly lower their overall tax burden especially when one partner has higher pay. The rule costs the government annually about 15.5 billion euros ($20 billion).
The court said that treating civil unions differently amounts to “unequal treatment because of sexual orientation.”
Failure to be vigilant in guaranteeing equality “leads to discrimination against a minority,” the court said.
The court acknowledged that married couples enjoy special privileges because the partners also accept a strong responsibility for each other, including financial, but it argued that the civil union implies the same duties and responsibilities for gay partners.
The court ordered the government to retroactively amend the relevant laws dating back to 2001, when civil union status was first introduced by a center-left government.
Gay rights campaigners cheered the court decision.
“This is a full-blown victory,” said opposition lawmaker Volker Beck, an outspoken gay-rights advocate. H e added that the next hurdle should be to grant gay couples equal rights when it comes to adoption.
Conservative politicians from Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union have traditionally argued that married couples must enjoy higher protection and tax benefits because they usually have children. But the court struck down that argument, saying that policies in favor of families and children cannot be promoted by discriminating against civil unions.