Tucson becomes second Arizona city to allow same-sex civil unions
Olympic diving champion Greg Louganis announces engagement
Former gender studies professor on FBI ‘Most Wanted’ list captured in Mexico
Brazil lawmakers OK bill to allow treatment of homosexuality as a disorder
Del. state House approves transgender protections bill
Eldest of ‘19 Kids and Counting’ joins anti-gay hate group FRC
Man pleads not guilty in New York City hate crime shooting
WASHINGTON — The U.S. House voted late Wednesday night in favor of a measure that aims to stop the Obama administration from taking any action in violation of the Defense of Marriage Act — even though the administration continues to enforce the law.
In a 245-171 vote, House lawmakers approved the amendment, introduced by freshman Rep. Tim Huelskamp (R-Kansas), as part of Commerce-Justice-Science appropriations legislation. The amendment reads, “None of the funds made available under this Act, may be used in contravention of the Defense of Marriage Act.”
Ian Thompson, legislative representative for the American Civil Liberties Union, said the amendment in effect does nothing because although the Justice Department is no longer defending DOMA in court, the Obama administration is still enforcing it.
“The Huelskamp Amendment is a solution in search of a problem,” Thompson said. “While there are multiple legal challenges to DOMA working their way through the federal courts, it is still binding. This amendment serves absolutely no purpose other than to score political points at the expense of gay and lesbian couples.”
After the Obama administration declared DOMA unconstitutional, the Justice Department filed legal briefs against the anti-gay law and sent Justice Department attorneys to argue against the statute in court during oral arguments. However, the administration continues to enforce the statute, which prohibits federal recognition of same-sex marriage.
According to Roll Call newspaper, Huelskamp had initially planned an amendment that would barred the use of funds for arguing against DOMA in court — which, if passed into law, would have had real impact. Huelskamp ultimately didn’t press forward with that amendment.
Huelskamp reportedly said he introduced the amendment not only because the Justice Department stopped defending DOMA in court, but also because of Vice President Joe Biden’s endorsement of same-sex marriage Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”
“The most immediate reason was the comments of the vice president of the United States,” Huelskamp was quoted as saying. “Stating his position is fine, but you tie that together with the issues with the lawsuit in California in which, essentially, the attorney general walked away from DOMA and said, ‘I’m not going to defend that.’”
Although the amendment passed on largely a party-line basis, seven Republicans voted “no”: Reps. Mary Bono Mack (R-Calif.), Richard Hanna (R-N.Y.), Nan Hayworth (R-N.Y.), Steven LaTourette (R-Ohio), Jerry Lewis (R-Calif.), Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.), and Rep. Lee Terry (R-Neb.). 16 Democrats voted for the measure.
Drew Hammill, a spokesperson for House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), said House Republicans “voted to tie the hands of the Obama administration with respect to their efforts to end discrimination against America’s families.”
“House Republicans continue to plant their feet firmly on the wrong side of history,” Hammill said. “Republican leaders refuse to bring up a bipartisan bill to reauthorize the Violence Against Women Act that includes critical domestic violence protections for the LGBT community, and Speaker Boehner continues his legal boondoggle to use taxpayer funds to defend the indefensible Defense of Marriage Act in court, including cases involving the families of our men and women of our U.S. Armed Forces.”
Hammill added, “These discriminatory actions only serve to advance fundamental unfairness in our society and are against the principles of liberty and equality that our country is built upon.”
Related articles:
Filed under: National Headlines
Looking back 50 years: Huge strides for the gay rights movement
Rubio: ‘I’m done’ with immigration bill if gay couples are included
Marco Rubio: No ‘special’ rights for gay Americans — but I’m not ‘a bigot’
‘America’s Got Talent’ contestant disowned by family because he is gay
Christian college expels lesbian, wants her to repay grant money
Mugabe vows to strengthen penalties against gays: ‘They should rot in jail’
Lesbian may be forced to testify against spouse in Ky. murder case
Southern Baptists officially oppose Boy Scouts’ policy to accept gay youth
Russia to ban adoption by same-sex couples
E.W. Jackson: Using my past anti-gay statements against me is ‘persecution’
At LGBT Pride reception, Obama urges ban on workplace bias against gays
‘M’ or ‘F’? Outdated IDs worry transgender people
Idaho GOP leaders urge lawmakers to erase local LGBT protections
So don’t tell us we have to register for selective service.
GOP fuktards
I thought one of their “guiding principles” was less government in peoples lives? Why do they keep injecting themselves into MY marriage? Hypocrites and fuktards, thats what they are!
Of course they did . . . LOL
Bob said it best
and the GOP says President Obama is dividing America.
For my own education: in what way is Obama enforcing DOMA?
How reactionary!
Marti, not reactionary — obstructionist!
Hello LGBTQ Nation
SWEET Entertainment is interested in speaking with you.
You’ve done some great collaborations.
Let’s talk.
You can like us and find out more info here…
http://www.facebook.com/SweetEntertainmentTelevision
We’re looking for videos, artits, entrepreneurs, talent!
Let’s go!
molasses jones
+ the SWEET TEAM!
347.850.4112
Assholes
Yeah, I don’t think I can top Bob either! ;-)
Wow…..creepy much? Could they please just get a flippin life and get their heads out of the gutter…. seriously! Who else in this country obsesses over what other people do in their bedrooms 24-7, for pete’s sake!…..It’s really getting creepy and we have far more important things that really need the attention of Congress like the economy, crumbling infrastructure and bringing troops home. Sheesh!
Damn these friggin republicasses all to hell!
What the idiots who vote for this bs fail to realize is that, by legalizing same-sex marriage they are opening up an avenue of more income for the government. They make money off of heterosexual marriage, why would letting LGBT people marry be any different?
One way to alienate a voting block of LGBT’s, youth, indies, missing anyone?
“16 Democrats voted for the measure.” I would like to know who these Dems are, please.
The article title is misleading, and the amendment has little affect.
Frank, I think the point is, with ALL the Actual REAL issues that need addressing they managed to get this done so efficiently…
come election time its our turn to show what we are made of __ to my glbt’s ~~~ Please get registered & get out at election time lets stand together and vote these idiots out of office
The sixteen Democrats supporting the amendment were: John Barrow (GA), Sanford Bishop (GA), Dan Boren (OK), Ben Chandler (KY), Jerry Costello (IL), Mark Critz (PA), Henry Cuellar (TX), Tim Holden (PA), Larry Kissell (NC), Dan Lipinski (IL), Jim Matheson (UT), Mike McIntyre (NC), Collin Peterson (MN), Nick Rahall, (WV), Mike Ross (AR), and Heath Shuler (NC).
Here you are!
Ya know i was going to vote romney till today. im voting all democrat in this election
The house is gonna come tumbling down.
Statistics on Euqality under the Constitution:
Obama +4, Congress – 120
does the current congress do anything for the American people !! or only against ??
How come it isn’t easy to prove that such actions are discriminatory? How come our leaders can keep fighting against equality? I could have sworn this was the land of the FREE!!
That is BS
We have a chance to clean house this year, there are elephants in the room VOTE THEM OUT!!!!!