EEOC

“No matter how you identify – dress appropriately for your workday.”

A federal worker union is sounding the alarm about Trump appointees trying to take away LGBTQ protections.

Desperate to avoid paying out a $20 million dollar verdict – with interest and fees – new lawyers are trying any tactic to get the judgement set aside.

The Supreme Court is set to hear arguments this week on whether the 55-year-old federal civil rights law extends job protections to LGBT and transgender workers nationwide.

Their argument is that trans women aren’t really women. The 54-page brief is just a riff on that.

One anti-LGBTQ senator is holding up her nomination because she’s coming for “you, your family, and your neighbors.”

LGBTQ people are racially diverse with one-third of the LGBTQ community made up of people of color.

The Justice Department argued that it’s perfectly legal for employers to discriminate based on off-the-job, private “sexual behavior.”

An increasing number of trial and appeals courts have found that existing law bars anti-LGBTQ discrimination, but no federal appellate court has so far supported this interpretation.

The attorney representing Aimee Stephens said she “is reasonably concerned that the EEOC may no longer adequately represent her interests going forward.”