A Republican Congressmember is facing public scrutiny for attending his own sonâs wedding with another man just days after he voted against same-sex marriage rights.
Rep. Glenn Thompson (R-PA) voted against the Respect for Marriage Act (RMA) last Tuesday. If passed, the bill would require states and the federal government to recognize same-sex and interracial marriages performed by other states should the Supreme Court take away those rights in the future.
Three days later, on Friday, he attended his sonâs wedding to another man.
Get the Daily Brief
The news you care about, reported on by the people who care about you:
This past Monday, Thompsonâs son told NBC News that he âmarried the love of [his] lifeâ on Friday, and Thompsonâs press secretary Maddison Stone confirmed that the Congressmember attended.
âCongressman and Mrs. Thompson were thrilled to attend and celebrate their sonâs marriage on Friday night as he began this new chapter in his life,â she said in an email. She also wrote that the Thompsons were âvery happyâ to welcome their son-in-law âinto their family.â
Before his sonâs wedding, Thompson explained that he was one of the 157 House Republicans to vote against the RMA because he thought it would be a win for Democrats in an election year.
âThis bill was nothing more than an election-year messaging stunt for Democrats in Congress who have failed to address historic inflation and out of control prices at gas pumps and grocery stores,â he told the Centre Daily.
Proponents of the RMA say that itâs necessary now that the Supreme Court has shown a willingness to overturn rights based on the notions of privacy and substantive due process in overturning Roe v. Wade. LGBTQ legal victories like Obergefell v. Hodges (which legalized same-sex marriage) and Lawrence v. Texas (which ended state bans on homosexuality) were cited by Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas in his concurring opinion as decisions the Court should âreconsiderâ in light of the end of the federal right to an abortion in the U.S.
Out Democrats have been critical of Republicans who say itâs a waste of time to protect marriage rights for same-sex and interracial couples.
âIf itâs not necessary, then vote for it. If youâre right that weâre worried and we shouldnât be, reaffirm it,â out Rep. David Cicilline (D-RI) said in his floor speech. âBut donât hide behind that to justify your refusal to vote for marriage equality in this country.â
âIf they donât want to spend a lot of time on this, they can vote âyes,â and move on, and that would be really reassuring for a lot of families around America, including mine,â out Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg said on CNN this weekend.
While Thompson attributed his vote against the RMA to the election year, he has a long track record of opposing LGBTQ equality. He has gotten a score of zero on HRCâs Congressional Scorecard for the past three sessions of Congress, showing his solid opposition to LGBTQ peopleâs rights.
He voted against the Equality Act, which would have added sexual orientation and gender identity to federal civil rights legislation, in 2021, which wasnât an election year.