News (USA)

A judge gave surprising reasons for knocking down Tampa’s ban on conversion therapy

Rear view at upset man in trouble get psychological support during therapy session, diverse friends people comforting helping depressed guy having trauma problem addiction at psychotherapy counseling
Photo: Shutterstock

A federal judge, U.S. District Judge William Jung, recently struck down Tampa, Florida’s ban against so-called ex-gay conversion therapy under a belief that it interferes with the state’s regulation of healthcare, “patients’ rights to privacy and parents’ rights to choose health care for their children.”

The case will likely head to an appellate court next.

Related: Judge rules that Christian adoption agency has a right to ban gay parents

Tampa passed its ban in 2017. It said therapists and counselors offering conversion therapy to minors would’ve “faced a $1,000 fine for a first offense and a $5,000 penalty for subsequent violations [and it] would have been enforced by city code enforcement officers,” writes The Tampa Bay Times.

Unsurprisingly, the Liberty Counsel — the SPLC-designated hate group that regularly mounts legal challenges against laws protecting LGBTQ people — challenged Tampa’s ban almost immediately on behalf of two ex-gay therapists. The Liberty Counsel’s challenge is part of a larger legal strategy to have similar bans tossed out in Boca Raton, Palm Beach County and nationwide.

According to The Tampa Bay Times, “Jung said state medical boards that oversee the licensing of mental health professionals already serve as a check on any malpractice.” Jung also said “no study has come up with a clear picture of whether the practice produces either beneficial or harmful outcomes” and added that Tampa’s ban seemed selective because the city hasn’t put similar scrutiny on “massage therapy, acupuncture, optometry, tattoo parlors and medical labs.”

But these reasons are all intellectually disingenuous. State medical boards have often let conversion therapists go ignored because they’re not reported by young patients, their parents or adults who voluntarily submit to their quackery.

As such, cities have the right to pass ordinances against local nuisances. As soon as professional medical groups and consumers begin speaking out against massage, acupuncture and other therapies, the city has every right to look into them and impose restraints for public safety — especially if state legislators and medical boards refuse to act.

While we may need more studies that prove the harmful effects of ex-gay therapy, at least one 2013 survey showed that 84% of ex-gay survivors say it left them with lasting shame and emotional harm.

Furthermore, “the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Counseling Association, the National Education Association, the National Association of School Psychologists and the Child Welfare League of America” and many other psychological associations all say that the practice is just a form of psychological torture that actively harms its subjects.

Rachel Maddow is playing a role in the ‘Batwoman’ TV series

Previous article

This man was fired for eating with his gay softball team

Next article