LANSING, Mich. — Democrat lawmakers are asking the Legislature to add protections for LGBT people to Michigan’s civil rights act.
House and Senate legislators announced bills on Wednesday that would add protections for sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression into the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act.
The effort comes a day after a Senate committee held a hearing on a bill that backers say protects people’s religious freedoms. Opponents say it permits discrimination against gays and others.
Republican Gov. Rick Snyder has threatened to veto the legislation unless lawmakers also extend anti-discrimination protections to gays.
Gideon D’Assandro is House Speaker Kevin Cotter’s spokesman. He says the Republican majority is not interested in revisiting the issue after it failed to pass last session.
On Tuesday, members of the Michigan Senate Judiciary Committee heard testimony on whether Michigan needs a law that backers say protects people’s religious freedoms and opponents say permits discrimination against gays and others.
The bill appears to have little chance of passing and may not go any further in the Legislature. Republican Gov. Rick Snyder has threatened to veto the legislation unless lawmakers also extend anti-discrimination protections to gays, and Republican Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Rick Jones of Grand Ledge said Tuesday that no further hearings were planned on the measure.
Article continues below
The bill would let people who say their exercise of religion has been substantially burdened by government cite the law in a claim or defense in a judicial or administrative proceeding.
Bill sponsor Sen. Mike Shirkey, a Republican from Clarklake, said the language is “substantially different” from Indiana’s religious objections law that recently prompted a backlash.
The bill “is not a license to discriminate,” Shirkey said.
He shared a decision-making flow chart that shows a standard for strict scrutiny in determining cases where the legislation would apply, Shirkey said.
Sen. Tory Rocca, a Republican from Sterling Heights, got into a heated exchange with Shirkey about the implications of the legislation.
Rocca asked Shirkey repeatedly whether he believed the bill would allow a landlord to deny housing to someone in an interracial marriage or a same-sex couple.
Shirkey said that was a civil rights issue. Rocca said Shirkey was avoiding answering the questions.
“Do you feel you should have a better idea of how something like that works if you bring up a bill like this?” Rocca asked.
Jones cut off the debate between the two.
Jami and Krista Contreras were among those who testified against the bill. The Detroit-area women say they believe a pediatrician refused to care for their baby because they are lesbians and are disappointed that there is no state or federal law to prohibit such a decision.
Shirkey said such scenarios would not be defended by his bill.
The hearing on the legislation came the same day the U.S. Supreme Court considered the legality of Michigan’s gay marriage ban.
Article continues below
Businesses from around the state have urged the Legislature not to take further action on the measure, and the Detroit Regional Chamber applauded the Senate committee for not voting on the bill.
“Amid the global war for talent, Michigan should send a very clear message that all persons are welcome to utilize their talents here. Similar legislation seemingly undermined Indiana’s reputation as a pro-job state in a matter of days,” said the chamber’s vice president of government relations, Brad Williams.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.