News (USA)

Controversial religious freedom bill hits snag in Louisiana state House


BATON ROUGE, La. — A religious objections bill similar to laws that have ignited a political firestorm in Arkansas and Indiana ran into a roadblock with the Louisiana Legislature on Monday, the first day of the legislative session.

Though it is supported by Republican Gov. Bobby Jindal, the “Marriage and Conscience Act” is opposed by Senate President John Alario, who said “it puts Louisiana in a light of hatred and bigotry and discrimination.”

And as lawmakers gaveled in the spring session, the bill wasn’t sent to a House committee, stalling the measure, at least temporarily, from getting a public hearing or legislative vote. In fact, of the hundreds of bills introduced Monday, the proposal sponsored by Rep. Mike Johnson, R-Bossier City, was the only bill that was not sent to committee.

The measure was bottled up after a legislator tried to take action on the bill while Johnson wasn’t present, said Rep. Walt Leger, the No. 2 ranking lawmaker who was presiding at the time. Leger, D-New Orleans, an opponent of the legislation, wouldn’t provide further details about what action was sought.

Johnson did not return requests for comment.

Article continues below

As written, the legislation would ban the state from denying any resident business licenses, benefits or tax deductions because of any actions that person takes “in accordance with a religious belief or moral conviction” about marriage. Affected businesses could include wedding planners, photographers and bakers who object to working with gay couples but fear state retribution.

Opponents of religious objections laws say they allow for businesses and others to discriminate against gays and lesbians on moral and religious grounds. But proponents — including Jindal — say the laws protect “religious liberty.”

Continue reading

Indiana hires PR firm to help repair damage from religious objections law flap

Previous article

Ariz. governor vetoes bill that could allow adoption discrimination against same-sex couples

Next article