News

Federal appeals court weighs overturning marriage bans in three southern states

Texas plaintiffs attorney Neel Lane speaks with the media outside of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Friday, Jan. 9, 2015, in New Orleans.
Texas plaintiffs attorney Neel Lane speaks with the media outside of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Friday, Jan. 9, 2015, in New Orleans. Stacy Revere, AP

[ Previous ]

The hearings turned repeatedly on when a society becomes ready for change.

Only 10 years of data has been gathered since Massachusetts became the first U.S. state to legalize same-sex marriages – not enough to understand the consequences, said Louisiana’s special counsel, Kyle Duncan.

“There are now 36 states and the District of Columbia that allow same-sex marriage and nothing has changed,” countered Camilla Taylor, a Lambda Legal Defense Fund attorney representing seven couples challenging Louisiana’s ban.

State attorneys argued that upholding “traditional marriage” helps states grow while reducing unplanned pregnancies.

“It is certainly rational” to fear that allowing gay marriage could undermine heterosexual marriages, Mitchell said, blaming lower fertility rates in Europe on a general acceptance of gay marriage there. The state of Texas, he said, has an “interest in encouraging couples to produce children.”

When this argument also came up during Mississippi’s case, Higginbotham said “you don’t need to have an incentive to have sex.”

Mitchell also said that Texans were “acting out of the deeply held belief in the benefits of traditional marriage.”

“Everyone knows this is a moral disapproval of homosexuality,” countered David Mcneel Lane, an attorney for Texas plaintiffs. “The reality is that my clients live every day under the cloud of stigma.”

Higginbotham and Smith were appointed to the court by President Ronald Reagan; Graves was appointed by President Barack Obama. Theirs could be among the last federal appellate hearings before the Supreme Court decides the issue.

The justices took no action Friday during their private conference in Washington, but could decide next week whether to consider this issue this term, meaning cases could be argued and decided by late June.

A split among the appellate courts makes an eventual intervention by the Supreme Court very likely.

Anti-gay-marriage laws in Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio and Tennessee were upheld in November by the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati. But four other appeals courts – based in Chicago, Denver, San Francisco and Richmond, Virginia – have ruled in favor of gay and lesbian couples. And with only 14 states still prohibiting same-sex unions, the justices may be more likely to consider a nationwide change.

The 5th Circuit also is considering a split decision. Texas and Mississippi’s bans were ruled unconstitutional, while U.S. District Judge Martin Feldman upheld Louisiana’s ban, bucking a trend of 20 consecutive rulings overturning bans in other states. Feldman’s ruling was the first to uphold a state ban since the Supreme Court struck down part of the federal Defense of Marriage Act in 2013.

Other states still enforcing same-sex marriage bans are Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Missouri (except in Kansas City and St. Louis), Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota.

Audio recordings here

© 2015, Associated Press, All Rights Reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Lawmaker aims to prevent federal ruling from allowing same-sex marriage in Texas

Previous article

Saks claims transgender employees are not protected from sex discrimination

Next article