<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LGBTQ Nation &#187; North Dakota</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lgbtqnation.com/category/nation/north-dakota/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lgbtqnation.com</link>
	<description>News, Opinions, Arts and Culture  &#124;  The Nation&#039;s LGBTQ News Magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:24:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<meta xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex,follow" />
		<item>
		<title>Durham N.C. city council passes resolution opposing anti-gay marriage amendment</title>
		<link>http://www.lgbtqnation.com/2011/07/durham-n-c-city-council-passes-resolution-opposing-anti-gay-marriage-amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lgbtqnation.com/2011/07/durham-n-c-city-council-passes-resolution-opposing-anti-gay-marriage-amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 00:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>By Kyle Luebke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Durham NC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lgbtqnation.com/?p=29539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Durham, N.C. City Council on Thursday passed a resolution stating its opposition to a proposed state constitutional amendment banning gay marriage. The resolution, sponsored by Councilman Mike Woodward, was passed unanimously by the seven member council.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Durham, N.C. city council on Thursday passed a resolution stating its opposition to a proposed state constitutional amendment banning gay marriage. The resolution, sponsored by Councilman Mike Woodward, was passed unanimously by the seven member council.</p>
<p><a class="highslide" onclick="return vz.expand(this)" href="http://www.lgbtqnation.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Durham-NC-300x206.jpg"><img src="http://www.lgbtqnation.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Durham-NC-300x206.jpg" alt="" title="Durham-NC-300x206" width="300" height="206" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-29541" /></a>Because of its location in the North Carolina Research Triangle, Durham has been attempting to market itself as a prime location for gay and lesbian couples to live and raise a family. </p>
<p>Not only did the city pass a <a href="http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/5814026/">resolution</a> in 2009 expressing its support for marriage equality, but it is also one of three cities in North Carolina -- the others being Chapel Hill and Carrboro -- which extend domestic partner benefits to gay and lesbian couples. </p>
<p>"We have got more important issues to deal with in this state," City Council member Eugene Brown <a href="http://www.newsobserver.com/2011/07/22/1361311/durham-council-opposes-proposed.html">said</a> after the vote. "Secondly I have just enough of a libertarian streak in me to say keep the government out of our bedrooms," unless it relates to practices such as sex with minors.</p>
<p>Durham elected officials expressed fears that if the proposed constitutional amendment passes, it could be used to invalidate the city's domestic partnership law, and embroil Durham in an expensive legal battle. </p>
<p>The text of the proposed amendment seems to give this fear legitimacy as it <a href="http://www.lgbtqnation.com/2011/04/constitutional-ban-on-same-sex-marriage-introduced-in-north-carolina-house/">states</a>, "Marriage between a man and a woman is the only domestic legal union that shall be valid or recognized in this State." </p>
<p>The proposed amendment must pass with three-fifths support in both chambers of the North Carolina Legislature before it can be placed on the ballot.</p>
<p>Currently, both chambers are controlled by the Republican party, which has been pushing for the ban as a way to bring voters out to the polls. </p>
<p>In March, <a href="http://publicpolicypolling.blogspot.com/2011/03/nc-supports-recognition-for-gay-couples.html">a poll</a> conducted by Public Policy Polling, found that the majority of North Carolina residents support some form of recognition of same-sex couples, whether it be in the form of marriage rights or civil unions. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lgbtqnation.com/2011/07/durham-n-c-city-council-passes-resolution-opposing-anti-gay-marriage-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/11 queries in 0.014 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 537/548 objects using memcached

Served from: www.lgbtqnation.com @ 2012-02-08 12:54:50 -->
