This article is one in a series showcasing the families who are plaintiffs in the marriage equality cases that will be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court on April 28. Read more here.
CINCINNATI — Married and living in New York City, Joseph Vitale and Robert Talmas joined the legal battle over Ohio’s same-sex marriage law because that’s where their adopted son was born. Both fathers want to be listed on Cooper’s birth certificate.
A couple since 1997, Vitale and Talmas married in New York in 2011. Both are from large families, and they wanted to have their own.
In 2013 they adopted a newborn, known in court documents as “Adopted Child Doe.” They slept in his hospital room in the Cincinnati suburb of Fairfield until he was discharged, took him home to New York, and received a final adoption decree from a New York court on Jan. 17, 2014.
Never Miss a Beat
Subscribe to our newsletter to stay ahead of the latest LGBTQ+ political news and insights.
That order lists them both as parents. But Ohio wanted only one of their names on an amended birth certificate.
They became part of the legal challenge to Ohio’s ban on same-sex marriage, which doesn’t recognize out-of-state gay marriages for birth or death certificates.
Article continues below
They later obtained a federal court order to have both listed, but the certificate notes that it is by court order.
Vitale said they are concerned that if the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling last year upholding Ohio’s same-sex marriage ban is allowed to stand, the state could amend Cooper’s birth certificate to remove one of their names.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.