MONTGOMERY, Ala. — The Alabama House on Thursday approved legislation saying no one can require a judge, minister or church to perform a wedding they don’t want to perform, a measure widely seen as targeting same-sex marriages.
The bill passed, 69-25, after four hours of sometimes heated debate. Supporters depicted it as an issue of religious liberty, while opponents called it blatant political pandering on the issue of same-sex marriage.
“No minister or judge should be compelled to marry anyone that they don’t want to,” bill sponsor Rep. Jim Hill, R-Odenville, said. Hill, a former judge, said he introduced the bill after getting calls from ministers and judges who were concerned they would be forced to perform weddings.
The bill does not specifically mention same-sex marriage, but states that no person is “required to solemnize a marriage for any person or persons.”
Lawmakers opposing the bill stayed at the House microphones for much of Thursday morning.
Article continues below“Nothing in this bill is going to change anything. It’s just pandering,” said Rep. Patricia Todd, Alabama’s only openly gay lawmaker. “Let’s deal with the real issues facing Alabama. This isn’t one of them,” she said.
Hill conceded that he knew of no judges or ministers who have ever been forced to perform a wedding. He said he brought the legislation to clarify the law.
The bill also gives civil immunity to churches, ministers, society and other religious-affiliated organization if they refuse to host or recognize a wedding.