The switch could put the Missouri case on a more direct route through the federal appellate courts at a time when U.S. judges have been increasingly striking down other states’ gay-marriage bans.
“We wanted at least one of the cases (from Missouri) to be considered in a court of broader jurisdiction,” Koster spokesman Eric Slusher said Thursday.
Although the state was not named as a defendant, Koster’s office intervened because the lawsuit alleges that Missouri’s constitutional prohibition on same-sex marriage violates equal-protection and due-process rights under the U.S. Constitution.
Because of the alleged federal violations, Koster’s office moved the case to U.S. District Court, where it has been assigned to Judge Ortrie Smith.
Koster, a Democrat who is running for governor in 2016, has said he personally supports gay marriage but will carry out his official duties by defending Missouri’s ban. His office filed federal court documents earlier this week arguing that Missouri’s prohibition should be upheld because states have a right to set their own rational constraints on domestic relations until the U.S. Supreme Court says otherwise.
Missouri voters adopted a state constitutional amendment in 2004 that limits marriage to one man and one woman. The Legislature passed a similar state law in 1996.
Article continues belowThe lawsuit contends the prohibition furthers no legitimate government interest and “serves only to disparage and injure same-sex couples.”
The decision to move the case to federal court does not affect a separate legal battle in St. Louis Circuit Court that arose in June after the city issued marriage licenses to several gay couples despite the Missouri prohibition.
The ACLU is also handling a separate lawsuit filed in February in Jackson County on behalf of several same-sex couples who got married outside of Missouri. That challenge seeks to have those marriages recognized in Missouri.
Follow this case: Lawson v. Kelly.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.