BOISE — Idaho Gov. C.L. “Butch” Otter has filed a petition with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals requesting an “en banc” hearing by an 11-judge panel of the court in an appeal of a federal magistrate’s ruling striking down Idaho’s same-sex marriage ban.
In most circuits, an en banc hearing means all 15 of the circuit’s judges hear the case, rather than just a three-judge panel. But because of the size the Ninth Circuit, an en banc hearing consists of an 11-judge panel — the chief judge and 10 others selected by random draw.
“Because the marriage issue is so passionately contested and so divisive among the citizenry, the perception of the legitimacy of this court’s resolution of it must be of paramount concern,” attorneys for the governor argue in their motion.
Never Miss a Beat
Subscribe to our newsletter to stay ahead of the latest LGBTQ+ political news and insights.
“A decision by an 11-judge panel stands far higher and stronger than does a decision by a three-judge panel, just as a decision by a three-judge panel stands far higher and stronger than does a decision by a single judge,” they argued.
Article continues below
In April, the state of Michigan asked the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals for an “en banc” hearing on its appeal of a federal judge’s ruling striking down that state’s same-sex marriage ban. The Michigan request was denied.
The And in the Idaho challenge, Latta v. Otter, the Ninth Circuit has scheduled arguments in the appeal for the week of September 8.
The Ninth Circuit court has scheduled arguments in the appeal for the week of September 8.
Case archives: Latta v. Otter.
