NASHVILLE, Tenn. — A proposal to protect wedding-related businesses from lawsuits if they refuse to provide services to same-sex couples is dead for the session after being withdrawn from a Senate committee on Tuesday.
The measure sponsored by Republican Sen. Mike Bell of Riceville was pulled from the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Under the measure, a person or group wouldn’t have to provide services for a domestic partnership or marriage not recognized by the state if doing so would violate their religious beliefs. Tennessee does not recognize same-sex marriages.
Bell had said he wanted to protect shop owners in Tennessee, noting that those in other states have been sued for refusing to do business.
Never Miss a Beat
Subscribe to our newsletter to stay ahead of the latest LGBTQ+ political news and insights.
But on Tuesday, he said he had talked with legal experts and believes there are current state protections that address his concerns.
“I’m convinced that current Tennessee law protects our business owners from the type of lawsuit harassment we’ve seen in other states,” he said.
Opponents of the measure say it’s intended to target gay, lesbian and transgender couples and is discriminatory.
“What was happening here was the effort to codify discrimination; to actually say that individuals could use their religion to discriminate, and that was not acceptable,” said Hedy Weinberg, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Tennessee. “Religion should not be used as a reason to discriminate.”
Article continues below
Supporters of the measure believe Tennessee’s ban will be overturned eventually, and that the bill would protect the religious beliefs of business owners.
Tennessee is one of five states where lawmakers have introduced “religious freedom” bills targeting same-sex couples, mostly in response to the rapid advancement of marriage equality.
A bill in South Dakota was defeated earlier Tuesday, and a bill in Kansas was declared “dead” by that state’s Senate Judiciary Committee.
Arizona’s bill is still making its way in the state legislature, and a measure in Idaho is on hold.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.