Follow breaking news @lgbtqnation

ACLU seeks preliminary block on Wisconsin’s same-sex marriage ban

Friday, February 28, 2014
John Hart, APPlaintiffs in a federal lawsuit challenging Wisconsin's ban on gay marriage appear during a press conference at the Madison Concourse Hotel in Madison, Wis., Monday, Feb. 03, 2014. The couples, from left, are Judi Trampf and Katy Heyning of Madison, Marie Carlson and Charvonne Kemp of Milwaukee, and Garth Wangemann and Roy Badger of Milwaukee.

John Hart, AP
Plaintiffs in a federal lawsuit challenging Wisconsin’s ban on gay marriage appear during a press conference at the Madison Concourse Hotel in Madison, Wis., Monday, Feb. 03, 2014. The couples, from left, are Judi Trampf and Katy Heyning of Madison, Marie Carlson and Charvonne Kemp of Milwaukee, and Garth Wangemann and Roy Badger of Milwaukee.

MADISON, Wis. — Civil rights advocates have asked a federal judge to block Wisconsin’s gay marriage ban while their lawsuit challenging the prohibition winds its way through court, arguing same-sex couples could suffer harm if the ban remains in place.

The American Civil Liberties Union filed a motion Thursday with U.S. District Judge Barbara Crabb seeking a preliminary injunction that would essentially nullify the ban until a final decision comes down.

ACLU attorneys argued in a brief supporting the motion they deserve a preliminary injunction because keeping the ban in place impairs gay couples’ legal rights and exposes gay Wisconsin couples who married in other states to potential prosecution.

“As a result of this marriage ban, two people who love each other and wish to commit to each other and build a life and family together are prohibited from marrying in Wisconsin and denied recognition of their existing marriage entered legally under the laws of another jurisdiction … if they are of the same sex,” the brief said.

The state Department of Justice, which is controlled by Republican Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen, is defending the ban. A spokeswoman said Friday the agency would respond in court. Crabb has set a hearing on the motion for March 27.

Wisconsin voters amended the state constitution in 2006 to outlaw gay marriage or anything substantially similar. The state has offered a domestic partner registry that affords gay couples a host of legal rights since 2009 but its future is in doubt; the conservative-leaning state Supreme Court is currently weighing whether it violates the constitution.

Encouraged by a U.S. Supreme Court ruling in June that found same-sex couples were entitled to federal benefits and a federal judge’s December decision to overturn conservative Utah’s gay marriage ban, the ACLU filed its Wisconsin lawsuit on Feb. 3 on behalf of a group of same-sex couples.

The lawsuit alleges the ban violates the U.S. Constitution’s Equal Protection and due process, asserting the prohibition deprives gay couples of legal protections married couples enjoy simply because of their sex.

It also points out that gay couples who reside in Wisconsin can’t get married in another state and return to Wisconsin legally; a provision in state law declares that anyone who marries in another state to circumvent Wisconsin law can face up to $10,000 in fines and jail time. ACLU attorneys said they don’t know of anyone who has actually been prosecuted under those statutes, however.

The lawsuit seeks a permanent injunction that would essentially strike the ban down. The ACLU has filed similar lawsuits in Pennsylvania, Virginia, North Carolina, Ohio and Oregon.

The ACLU’s brief Thursday argues the organization is entitled to a preliminary injunction because it will probably win the case on the merits and the ban is causing irreparable harm to its clients.

Crabb gave the Justice Department until March 21 to file any opposing arguments. A hearing has been set for March 27.

Follow the case: Wolf and Schumacher v. Walker.

© 2014, Associated Press, All Rights Reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Share this article with your friends and followers:

Archives: , , , ,

Filed under: Wisconsin

13 more reader comments:

  1. Not gonna happen. Get with the times honey.

    Posted on Friday, February 28, 2014 at 3:56pm
  2. Not sure what you mean, Burt ... ?

    Replied on Friday, February 28, 2014 at 4:08pm
  3. It's gonna happen everywhere.

    Replied on Friday, February 28, 2014 at 4:46pm
  4. Burt, turn on the TV, its coming, thanks to a little old lady by the name of Edie Windsor

    Replied on Friday, February 28, 2014 at 5:36pm
  5. I’m not understanding this fully, so what does this mean, we don’t get our marriage equality?

    Posted on Friday, February 28, 2014 at 3:58pm
  6. They're requesting an injunction that would invalidate the ban while the lawsuit challenging it makes its way through the court system.

    Replied on Friday, February 28, 2014 at 4:07pm
  7. Thank you for explaining this. I hope Wisconsin gets marriage equality, it's sad that we have to fight for a right that every human being should have.

    Replied on Friday, February 28, 2014 at 4:12pm
  8. Rose, a couple needs to step up and file a suit! I know Ive seen plenty of lesbian couples in WI

    Replied on Friday, February 28, 2014 at 5:37pm
  9. Is it possible to fight for same sex marriage under a gender discrimination rather than sexual orientation discrimination argument? Gender is a protected class so shouldn’t it be easier to argue a gender bias than a sexual orientation bias?

    Posted on Friday, February 28, 2014 at 4:01pm
  10. *Operation Freedom from Religion Begins* We will Not be Controlled by False Doctrine! Christianity is a Serious Mental Illness and Should be Taken Seriously!

    Posted on Friday, February 28, 2014 at 4:08pm
  11. Oops I misread.

    Posted on Friday, February 28, 2014 at 4:35pm
  12. Equality in this country, must happen, I sent going to happen and we aren’t going to let it happen!

    Posted on Friday, February 28, 2014 at 5:31pm
  13. Thank you ACLU!

    Posted on Friday, February 28, 2014 at 7:41pm