HARRISBURG, Pa. — Federal court decisions to overturn bans on same-sex marriage in two conservative states may not have an immediate effect in Pennsylvania, the only northeastern state that does not recognize gay marriages.
Rather, Pennsylvania state Rep. Brian Sims said Wednesday that the gay rights community is keeping its eyes trained on a scheduled federal court trial in Harrisburg. The high-profile case was filed six months ago and represents the first known challenge to a 1996 Pennsylvania law that bans recognition of same-sex marriages.
“The communities working on marriage equality in Pennsylvania … are really paying close attention to June 9,” said Sims, a leading gay rights advocate.
About a half-dozen other cases challenging aspects of the state’s ban have been filed since and are pending in county, state and federal courts.
Lawyer Witold J. Walczak of the American Civil Liberties Union says the case’s legal team is planning on going to trial and has no plans to seek an emergency ruling to strike down Pennsylvania’s law, citing decisions in Oklahoma and Utah.
Sims and Walczak expect the case to ultimately go to the U.S. Supreme Court. When appeals courts consider weighty matters, especially on constitutional law, they generally prefer to have a full record, Walczak said.
Republicans who control the Pennsylvania Legislature have refused to consider bills to reverse the state’s ban on same-sex marriage, and Gov. Tom Corbett, also a Republican, opposes gay marriage.
Not including Utah and Oklahoma, 27 states still have constitutional prohibitions on same-sex marriage. Four more – Indiana, Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Wyoming – do not permit it through state laws.
The closely watched Pennsylvania case is being handled by U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III, a Republican and an appointee of former President George W. Bush who is perhaps best known for his handling of one of the biggest courtroom clashes between faith and evolution since the 1925 Scopes Monkey Trial.
In that 2005 decision, Jones barred the Dover Area School District in southern Pennsylvania from teaching “intelligent design” in biology class and said its first-in-the-nation decision to insert it into the science curriculum violated the constitutional separation of church and state. He called it “a religious view, a mere re-labeling of creationism, and not a scientific theory.”
Sims said Jones is adept at handling big cases that are bound for higher courts.
“He’s building a very solid and a very complete case in the knowledge that it’s going to the Supreme Court,” Sims said.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.