Follow breaking news @lgbtqnation

Neb. county votes to extend benefits to same-sex spouses of employees

Wednesday, December 4, 2013

OMAHA, Neb. — Douglas County, Neb., will extend benefits to same-sex spouses of employees who were legally married in other states, said board officials who voted Tuesday in favor of the measure.

SourceOmaha, county seat of Douglas County, Neb.

Source
Omaha, county seat of Douglas County, Neb.

The Douglas County Board agreed to change the definition of an eligible spouse so it can include someone who is the same gender as the employee, the Omaha World-Herald reported. The new definition covers all benefits including health insurance.

The county, which is self-insured, will briefly reopen its enrollment period to accommodate the newly eligible spouses. Benefits will begin Jan. 1.

“I think it’s the right thing to do,” said board member Mike Boyle. “I think it’s the legal thing to do.”

The decision puts the county more in line with the federal government. It issued new guidelines earlier this year after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down part of the Defense of Marriage Act.

Board member Clare Duda, the lone vote against the measure, said he wanted the county to be more in line with how the federal government administers the Family and Medical Leave Act. That law indicates a spouse is defined or recognized by the state where the employee lives.

The city of Omaha recently said it would not offer health insurance and dental benefits to spouses of legally married gay employees. Mayor Jean Stothert said such coverage would need to be negotiated in future union contracts. The Omaha police union has filed a grievance in response.

© 2013, Associated Press, All Rights Reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Share this article with your friends and followers:

Archives: , , ,

Filed under: Nebraska

6 more reader comments:

  1. it is just sad that rights and benefits of other human beings need to be voted on. So degrading.

    Posted on Wednesday, December 4, 2013 at 2:39pm
  2. Civil rights are supposed to be guaranteed and not left up to a popular vote.

    Posted on Wednesday, December 4, 2013 at 2:48pm
  3. Breaking down resistance to established norms is a slow and painful process, but it is the right thing to do.

    Posted on Wednesday, December 4, 2013 at 3:14pm
  4. We live in an unfair world.x

    Posted on Wednesday, December 4, 2013 at 3:14pm
  5. YAY

    Posted on Wednesday, December 4, 2013 at 4:42pm
  6. Right now, there is this wave of pressure for counties and states to agree with giving us our basic civil rights, and it’s working. There are some states that will have to be forced by a federal court, but those will be forever flagged as the worst, and properly avoided from that point on.

    Posted on Wednesday, December 4, 2013 at 9:31pm