WASHINGTON — A Republican senator’s embrace of gay marriage is the latest sign of soul-searching in a party struggling to adapt in a society whose demographics — and views on emotional issues — are changing fast.
Gay marriage still divides the party, with the conservative wing strongly opposed. But an increasing number of Republicans, now including Sen. Rob Portman of Ohio, are reversing course. Many others simply downplay the subject.

Sen. Rob Portman at the Republican National Convention in Tampa, Fla. on Aug. 29, 2012.
Photo: J. Scott Applewhite, AP
With the issue of immigration also shifting rapidly under Republicans’ feet, they seem increasingly focused — and united — on one overarching goal: keeping income taxes from rising. Their solidarity on that issue is hindering President Barack Obama’s efforts to make higher tax revenue part of a compromise approach to deficit spending and expensive social programs.
These trends raise the possibility that the GOP — reeling after losing the popular vote in five of the last six presidential elections — will lessen its identity with hot-button social issues and sharpen its emphasis on tax and spending matters.
Portman announced Friday that he now supports gay marriage, linking his stand to learning that one of his sons is gay.
A former U.S. trade representative and White House budget chief, Portman is seen as one of the party’s most knowledgeable and effective leaders. Mitt Romney considered him to be his running mate last year. Portman says he told Romney of his son Will’s sexuality but does not believe it affected Romney’s decision.
As a U.S. House member in 1996, Portman supported the Defense of Marriage Act, or DOMA. It defines marriage as between a man and a woman and bars federal recognition of same-sex marriage.

Sen. Rob Portman (left), in a 2009 photo with his wife, Jane, daughter Sally, and son Will, after announcing his bid for the U.S. Senate.
Photo: David Kohl, AP
Portman’s reversal makes him the only Senate Republican to openly back gay marriage.
“I have come to believe that if two people are prepared to make a lifetime commitment to love and care for each other in good times and in bad, the government shouldn’t deny them the opportunity to get married,” Portman wrote in an op-ed article in The Columbus Dispatch.
He said he had talked to his pastor and others, including Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., who opposes gay marriage, and to former Vice President Dick Cheney, who supports it.
Cheney, whose younger daughter is a lesbian, became arguably the best-known Republican to embrace gay marriage with his announcement in June 2009.
Portman said his previous views on marriage were rooted in his Methodist faith.
However, he wrote, “Ultimately, for me, it came down to the Bible’s overarching themes of love and compassion and my belief that we are all children of God.”
Despite his party’s struggles with Americans’ increasing acceptance of gay rights, many GOP leaders met Portman’s news with silence or a shrug.
A spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner, who shares Portman’s Cincinnati background, said the senator “is a great friend and ally, and the speaker respects his position, but the speaker continues to believe that marriage is between a man and a woman.”
In January, Boehner chastised the Obama administration for dropping its legal defense of the Defense of Marriage Act, which the Supreme Court is to consider this month. Boehner authorized the continued use of public funds to defend the law in courts.
Boehner’s latest comments reflect the change among many mainstream Republicans, who now deal with gay marriage in largely unemotional, legalistic terms rather than emotional terms about sin and God’s will.
Congress now has several openly gay members, including a senator, Wisconsin Democrat Tammy Baldwin.
At the U.S. House, which was in session Friday, several conservatives had little or nothing to say about Portman’s announcement.
Gay marriage “is not the most front-burner issue,” said Rep. James Lankford, R-Okla. “We still have the same legal issues we’ve always had with the Defense of Marriage Act,” which he supports, he said.
Citing Obama’s position, he said, “It’s more a separation of powers issue than it is anything else.” Lankford said other Republicans have supported same-sex marriage, so “this is not anything new.”
In another legal matter — California’s ban on same-sex marriage — all 21 state attorneys general who have signed legal briefs or letters urging the Supreme Court to uphold the law are Republican.
White House spokesman Josh Earnest said Friday: “What is clear is that we are witnessing a pretty significant sociological shift in this country.”
“It’s happening right before our eyes in a way that says a lot about our country, that we have a country where we prioritize equality and fairness,” he said.
Obama said last year he personally supports gay marriage, a step some liberals called overdue.
Polls show that public opinions on gay rights, including same-sex marriage, have shifted perhaps more rapidly than on any other major issue in recent times. In Gallup polling last November, 53 percent of adult Americans said same-sex marriages should be granted the same status as traditional marriages, while 46 percent felt they should not be valid.
Those figures were nearly reversed two years earlier. In 1996, when Gallup first asked about gay marriages, 27 percent felt they should be valid.
Many social and religious conservatives still oppose gay marriage. Some spoke up at the Conservative Political Action Conference, which was under way Friday in suburban Washington.
Randy Smith, a technology entrepreneur from California, said Portman’s decision violates key conservative principles.“Conservative values are based on God’s word,” Smith said. “If he is professing to be a Christian, I’d have no part of him.”
Arne Owens, a “pro-family movement” activist from Virginia, said Portman’s shift “does make it harder to maintain support for traditional marriage. There’s no question about that.”
John Radell, head of the Faith and Freedom Coalition of Delaware, said Portman’s personal situation was difficult, “but that doesn’t mean you stray from your faith.”
“I understand loving your son,” he said. “But Sen. Portman represents more than his son.”
Radell said that “without question” Portman’s shift would make his political future — particularly any presidential aspirations — more difficult.
Curt Steiner, an Ohio GOP consultant who helped run Portman’s first House campaign in 1993, disagreed.
“I think it’s always good to be forthright with your positions,” Steiner said. “Some social conservatives will disagree with Rob Portman on this issue, but they understand the life that he leads, they understand his commitment to family, and they understand his commitment to them.”
The leader of a conservative group that promoted passage of a 2004 amendment in Ohio to ban gay marriage said he has heard from several people upset by Portman’s stance.
“They feel betrayed,” said Phil Burress, president of Citizens for Community Values. “They’re not mad. They’re sad and betrayed.”
Ohio Republican Party Chairman Bob Bennett agreed that some Republicans are unhappy, but he said he received more phone calls Friday about the governor’s budget. He said Portman has “taken a great deal of time to think it through and I certainly respect his right to make up his own mind.”
Richard Socarides, who was President Bill Clinton’s top adviser on gay issues, said Portman’s son Will “proved once again that the most powerful political act any gay person can take is coming out.” He said polls show that “people who know a gay person are far less likely to support discrimination.”
Other prominent Republicans who have endorsed gay marriage include: Sen. John McCain’s wife, Cindy, and daughter, Meghan; former first lady Laura Bush; former national GOP Chairman Ken Mehlman and former U.S. Solicitor General Ted Olson.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Filed under: Editor's Picks, National Headlines














Good; about time for that to happen!
“polls show that “people who know a gay person are far less likely to support discrimination”…and this is exactly why when I hear a bigot say “I have (many) gay friends” I call total bullshit.
tonight I heard on the news that Portman thinks state legislators and bigot ballot voters have a right to deny us our right to marry
But that would require having a soul.
wait….Republicans have souls??
Lincoln? Creation of Public Schools? Teddy Roosevelt?
Good..sometimes it takes someone close to u especially a family member to see their loved ones for who they are and not what society dictates
don’t hold your breath waiting for the entire party to follow his lead
We could pray for a Miracle! Grandma Kay
Just sorry that it took him two years to support his son.
Last year he was still campaigning with Romney against ENDA. He hasn’t mentioned where he stands on that yet.
So now he enbraces gay marriage, who cares. Typical Republican reaction, the only time they consider the plight of others is when there is a personal connection. So now we have to be grateful because he lends his support? I’ll pass
Rob Portman gets points from me. Some people just live in this little bubble, and when they see gay people are no different than them…they will come around to the right side.
Doesn’t one have to have a soul in order to search it?
put lipstick on a pig, its still a pig
They have souls?!
wait a minute…Republicans have souls?
Portman is still a self-serving egotist unconcerned with the plight of others. This issue touches his own life now, what about when it was the lives of his constituents? He’s disgusting.
so..to put this correctly,be against gay marriage unless your son comes out! What a hipporcrit
Portman didn’t disown his son as my father did me. He may be a politician, but at least he chose to suport us now instead of later after he lost an election.
some of you make me sick, if he was truly soulless, he’s have thrown his son under the bus or a member of the Westboro Baptist Church, Jeez…
look yes he was wrong in discriminating however he was able to redeem himself and he embraced his son instead of some parents out there who did worse to their outed children give him a break here everyone deserves a second chance when they prove themselves.
With the GOP it’s often for their own only. With his change of heart based on his relationship with his son others will benefit. It doesn’t matter how he came to change his mind, he’s CHANGED his mind and now lets hope his votes reflect this new view. His actions from this point forward on LGBTQ issues will be of interest. Lets see what happens…
Simple pandering unfortunately
Portman did not change his mind on marriage – in his OpEd he said gay bashing thugs should be able to vote on marriage and SCOTUS should not rule THAT IS NOT BEING FOR MARRIAGE EQUALITY
http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/editorials/2013/03/15/gay-couples-also-deserve-chance-to-get-married.html
“The process of citizens persuading fellow citizens is how consensus is built and enduring change is forged. That’s why I believe change should come about through the democratic process in the states. Judicial intervention from Washington would circumvent that process as it’s moving in the direction of recognizing marriage for same-sex couples. An expansive court ruling would run the risk of deepening divisions rather than resolving them.”
Republicans don’t have souls, because to become a successful politician, you have to sell your soul.
(This applies to all successful politicians, not just Republicans)
Maybe they should skip the soul searching, and mingle with the lgbt community, and they’d see that we don’t bite
about damn time..sheesh
unless they want to just keep losing elections..
Right. If they had any.
Come on! They’ll say and/or do anything to get power. These are not nice people.
Search hard and deep
Oh please. They know they’ve lost this one. The supreme court is about to get rid of DOMA. His son came out to him years ago, and he’s just now changed his mind? Great timing! Sickening.
The Grossly Obnoxious Party needs to search more than its soul! However these sudden changes in the attitudes of some recently is a calculated move to capture more votes during the next election.
Here is a man who loves his son.