Advertisement

Targeted local ads for local businesses. Click here.

Latest News:

Issak-cropped
A boy named Issak

May 20, 2013
Filed: Saturday, January 5, 2013

Eric Cantor and the Violence Against Women Act — What is wrong with these Republicans?

Submit to redditSubmit to StumbleUponDigg ThisPin it on PinterestShare on LinkedInShare on Tumblr+1Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

And so it begins…

The love and peace of the Holiday season is apparently not something the United States House of Representatives is willing let flow into any portion of U.S. politics.

What is wrong with these Republicans? I’m not trying to be funny, I’m honestly asking – what is wrong with these Republicans?

It’s unconscionable to refuse to bring the Violence Against Women Act to the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives for a vote before the end of the 112th session of Congress.

Since the introduction of The Violence of Women Act in 1994, the bill has passed in a bipartisan manner – until now. Eric Cantor didn’t like it – so he killed the bill.

He killed the bill because he (Eric Cantor) and other House Republicans didn’t like the portions of the bill that had been expanded by the U.S. Senate, to cover immigrants, members of the LGBT community, and the Native American community living within tribal jurisdiction.

Just to be clear – the expanded version of the legislation passed the Senate in April, 2012 by a 68-31 vote.

But – when the legislation moved to the House of Representatives – they didn’t like the expanded version, so they wrote their own, scaled-back version which omitted the expanded victims – immigrants, LGBT, and Native American victims. It’s been reported that Eric Cantor absolutely refused to budge on the LGBT, undocumented immigrant, and most especially on the Native American tribal jurisdiction provisions. I find this so disgusting, and the fact that other Republicans just followed his lead – unconscionable.

And these Republican women – Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers for example – she was actually out trying to make a case for the Republican version of the bill without the expansions – When asked by Chris Matthews why they (the Republicans) don’t cover people who are not in traditional marriages – her answer was – “…That is an issue – there is no – there is nothing under federal law that currently recognizes same-sex couples…”

What sort of woman would believe it was okay for any woman – gay or straight – to not have any sort of protection under the law? Who does that?

My feeling is this – either we cover all people who are victims of domestic violence or we don’t cover any of them. How on earth do you choose who gets help and who doesn’t? What on earth would make you believe that you have the power to decide who gets help and who is left to just get the crap beat out of them with no recourse?

Is this where we are now? Is this the people we vote into power? People who won’t protect those who need protecting – People who won’t vote on giving aid to victims of super storms – People who continue to spend tax-payers money on protecting what they consider traditional marriage (DOMA), and a Pentagon that doesn’t believe Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh are hate-speech but ban LGBT internet sites from their workers.

And so the fight continues…

Opinions and advice expressed in our Views & Voices columns represent the author's own views and not necessarily those of LGBTQ Nation. We welcome comments and editorials of opposing views and diverse perspectives. To submit a article or editorial, contact us here.

Connect with LGBTQ Nation.
The Nation's most followed LGBTQ news magazine.

Tags: Eric Cantor, GOP, Premium, Republicans, U.S. House of Representatives, Violence Against Women Act

Filed under: Views & Voices

Advertisement

Share and Comment:

12 more reader comments:

  1. This man is a moron. Please stop giving him media attention. I hate the site of his stupid face.

    Posted on Saturday, January 5, 2013 at 12:45pm
  2. evil bastard oh well do you really expect sanity from this FOOL?

    Posted on Saturday, January 5, 2013 at 12:49pm
  3. I say we kick every one out of the congress….and instate a new one….one with out religious bias!

    Posted on Saturday, January 5, 2013 at 1:13pm
  4. Hey how about we legalize violence against arrogant men?

    Posted on Saturday, January 5, 2013 at 1:47pm
  5. The fact that he is Representative of Virginia says it all right there. Virginia (with Cantor’s help I’m sure) ratified a constitutional amendment defining marriage as the union of a man and a woman in November 2006. The state recognizes no other same-sex relationship. Virginia law does not address discrimination based on gender identity or sexual orientation. Virginia’s hate crime laws address violence based on race, religious conviction, color or national origin, but not on sexual orientation or gender identity. So basically, an LGBT individual has no rights in Virginia. Thank you Eric Cantor! And now straight women whether immigrant or not has no protection under the law either. Nice.

    Posted on Saturday, January 5, 2013 at 1:55pm
  6. I hope the tribes send an arrow through his wall on behalf of all women and the men who support them.

    Posted on Saturday, January 5, 2013 at 3:36pm
  7. I say slip some estrogen into his drink then he might change his mind

    Posted on Saturday, January 5, 2013 at 5:53pm
  8. Butt- fuck the sissy.

    Posted on Saturday, January 5, 2013 at 9:50pm
  9. Cantor is a pig!

    Posted on Sunday, January 6, 2013 at 10:54am
  10. Eric Cantor and his GOP crew ought to be ashamed of themselves. Every one of them.

    Posted on Sunday, January 6, 2013 at 9:37pm
  11. he makes me want to puke, what a sick individual, what assholes even voted him into office.

    Posted on Monday, January 7, 2013 at 10:43am
  12. Slimy little scumbag.

    Posted on Monday, January 7, 2013 at 11:02am
        News Tips / Contact Us Join our Mailing List
Receive our nightly report of all the day's news.
 
Thank you. Please check your email now to confirm your subscription, and please be sure to add [email protected] to your safe senders list.
 
Thank you! Your message has been sent.