Follow breaking news @lgbtqnation

Appeals court: Boy Scouts can lease public land despite ban on gay members

Thursday, December 20, 2012

SAN FRANCISCO — A federal appeals court on Thursday said that two leases held by the Boy Scouts of America do not violate the constitutional separation of church and state, despite the Scouts’ policies that prohibit atheists, agnostics and homosexuals from becoming members.

In San Diego, an organization chartered by the Boy Scouts leases portions of two popular city parks, and in exchange for spending money developing facilities on the land, the Scouts pay virtually no rent.

A lower court judge found the leases unconstitutional, but on Thursday a unanimous three judge panel on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed that decision.

The city has leased 123 parcels to non-profit agencies, the overwhelming majority of which are secular in nature, the court wrote, and 96 of those leases require no payment of rent.

“The city’s practice of leasing its lands is by no means occasional or targeted in favor of sectarian organizations,” the court ruled.

“There is no evidence that the city’s purpose in leasing the subject properties to the Boy Scouts was to advance religion, and there is abundant evidence that its purpose was to provide facilities and services for youth activities,” wrote Judge William C. Canby Jr., appointed by former President Jimmy Carter, for the unanimous panel.

The decision stemmed from a lawsuit brought by a lesbian couple and an agnostic couple, who said the leases of public land to groups that discriminate violated both the state and federal constitutions.

M. Andrew Woodmansee, an attorney for the plaintiffs, said they were reviewing the court’s opinion and considering all options for further appeal.

Deron Smith, a spokesman for the Boy Scouts, said the organization would continue to focus on serving local communities.

Share this article with your friends and followers:

Archives: , , ,

Filed under: California

6 more reader comments:

  1. As long as they are paying the same rate as any other lease holder and complying with safety laws, I’m fine with them having the same rights as other organisations. Mind you, I think they are bigoted stupid homophobic idiots, but they do have a right assembly and association. Even idiots can choose to just hang with other idiots.

    Posted on Thursday, December 20, 2012 at 6:28pm
  2. @Matthew, I agree…for adult idiots to hang out. I dont trust them anywhere near children.

    Posted on Thursday, December 20, 2012 at 6:30pm
  3. Must be a homophobe on the bench

    Posted on Thursday, December 20, 2012 at 6:42pm
  4. I personally don’t like the discrimination from the boy scouts, and I also know that some boy scouts don’t agree with the discrimination. However, if they become discriminatory about who is allowed to use this while they “focus on serving local communities,” Call them out on it.

    Posted on Thursday, December 20, 2012 at 7:03pm
  5. SUX

    Posted on Thursday, December 20, 2012 at 7:17pm
  6. Personally the court should rake them over the coals

    Posted on Thursday, December 20, 2012 at 11:24pm