Follow breaking news @lgbtqnation

Nadler pushes DOMA repeal, despite recent court rulings

CHRIS JOHNSON | Washington Blade
Wednesday, October 24, 2012

A New York Democrat leading the charge against the Defense of Marriage Act in Congress is stressing the need for legislative action against the anti-gay law despite a string of victories in the courts.

Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) told the Washington Blade on Monday that legislation to repeal DOMA — the Respect for Marriage Act, which he sponsors in the U.S. House — may offer married same-sex couples greater flexibility with federal benefits as opposed to a U.S. Supreme Court ruling striking down the statute.

Rep. Jerrold Nadler is calling for legislative repeal of DOMA in the wake of court rulings against the law.
Washington Blade file photo by Michael Key.

“The recent series of affirmative rulings in federal court give us a clear indication of where DOMA is ultimately headed, but we don’t know if a Supreme Court decision would be enough to ensure federal recognition of same-sex marriages,” Nadler said. “We need to pass the Respect for Marriage Act because its certainty provision would enable legally married same-sex couples to receive federal recognition no matter which state they move.”

In addition to repealing DOMA, the Respect for Marriage Act, has a “certainty provision” that would allow married same-sex couples to retain federal benefits of marriage — including certain Social Security benefits, immunity from the estate tax and the ability to jointly file income taxes — even if these couples marry in one state and to move to another that doesn’t recognize same-sex marriage.

Nadler added the need to pass the Respect for Marriage Act “is one of the many reasons” why LGBT rights supporters need to work to re-elect President Obama, who’s endorsed the legislation, and put Democrats back in control of the House. The latter will be a tall order to fill because political observers expect Democrats may make some gains, but will likely fall short of the 25 seats needed for them to regain a majority.

The New York lawmaker spoke to the Washington Blade following a New York City meeting at Gay Men’s Health Crisis with LGBT advocates — including Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) and lesbian New York City Council Speaker Christine Quinn — in which participants discussed ways to advance marriage equality and federal benefits for gay couples.

That meeting took place just days after the U.S. Second Circuit of Appeals became the second federal appellate court to rule against DOMA in the case of Windsor v. United States and the first appellate court to apply heightened scrutiny in determining the law is unconstitutional. The Windsor lawsuit — along with three others — is pending review before the U.S. Supreme Court. Justices haven’t yet made an announcement on whether they’ll take up the lawsuits, but are expected to take up at least one of the cases to make a nationwide ruling on DOMA.

Jon Davidson, legal director at Lambda Legal, concurred that passage of the Respect for Marriage Act would afford greater certainty for married same-sex couples that wouldn’t necessarily be granted after a court ruling.

Continue reading at the Washington Blade

© Washington Blade. Reprinted by permission.

Archives: , , , , ,

Filed under: National Headlines

7 more reader comments:

  1. Tax $ wasted on ignorance

    Posted on Wednesday, October 24, 2012 at 3:52pm
  2. Ignorance & bitter idiocy

    Posted on Wednesday, October 24, 2012 at 4:01pm
  3. Did you guys actually read the article? This guy is fighting to REPEAL ignorance. Hello?

    Posted on Wednesday, October 24, 2012 at 4:10pm
  4. The fact that it’s even an issue still was my point. But you’re right, I didn’t read it, the headline misled me, I took the bait.

    Posted on Wednesday, October 24, 2012 at 4:18pm
  5. Timothy 4:

    King James Version

    1Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; 2Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron; 3Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth. 4For every creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving: 5For it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer.

    Posted on Wednesday, October 24, 2012 at 4:31pm
  6. @Nadler, no means, NO!

    Posted on Wednesday, October 24, 2012 at 8:46pm
  7. cool

    Posted on Thursday, October 25, 2012 at 1:12am