Follow breaking news @lgbtqnation
Sharon Stapel

Views & Voices

‘Violence is violence and the culture that creates it is responsible’

Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Violence is violence and the culture that creates it is responsible.

There is a difference between denouncing violence and inciting violence – this seems obvious but this past week has shown us that the line between these two is slim.

I do, and will continue to, denounce the shooting of the guard Leo Johnson at the Family Research Council offices last week. At the New York City Anti-Violence Project, we know that all violence is unacceptable and violence predicated on a disagreement in identity, beliefs or political positions is abhorrent.

Our program, the National Coalition of Anti-Violence Programs (NCAVP), joined with national LGBT groups last week in denouncing the FRC shooting. We denounce violence because we know that violence has never effectively solved or resolved difference and never will.

And we know of what we speak: just about every week, we release a statement about anti-LGBTQH violence or murder because it happens everywhere, all the time.

Every year NCAVP releases two reports about violence directed at lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and HIV-affected people because of their sexual orientation or gender identity. Last year we saw the highest murder rate of LGBTQH people ever.

Our recommendations in the report call for community-based responses, responses across all fields of work and study and responses from our local and national institutional partners. We don’t suggest that people who commit violence against LGBTQH people should be killed. Because that would be antithetical to what we do – and just plain wrong.

Yet, since the FRC shooting, the backlash from the right has been as violent as any I’ve seen.

Joe Jervis posted two tweets today that called for his death – because he blogged and tweeted about the FRC shootings. Now, it’s no secret that the right and the left (or whatever iteration of opposite sides of the issue you prefer) do not agree about whether LGBT people should be respected and afforded the same rights and responsibilities of others in this country. And I think it’s time we examine the differences in the cultures we create in having that discussion.

I’m not going to suggest all LGBT folks are non-violent because that would be silly. However, if you look at the organized movement toward LGBT equality, there are no mainstream or even left of mainstream organizations who advocate that the murder of people who are opposed to LGBT equality is a viable solution to meeting our goal.

Yet a quick scan of the internet shows that there are calls for LGBT people to be “penned up,” urges the abduction of the children of LGBT people, calls for the government to “kill the gays.”

Now the FRC is suggesting that the Southern Poverty Law Center’s labeling of them as a hate group encouraged this shooting.

I would suggest that the culture that SPLC is creating is one aimed at denouncing hate and calling out the institutions that perpetrate that hate. I would further suggest that SPLC did not urge its constituency to pen anyone up, take their children or ask the government to murder them.

Much of the culture that is created from the right, however, is predicated on violence being the solution to “the homosexual” problem and inciting this violence. And we see that violence being carried out every day.

Shooting anyone associated with FCR is wrong. And so is creating a culture that would suggest that this violence is ever a solution to our differences.

Opinions and advice expressed in our Views & Voices columns represent the author's own views and not necessarily those of LGBTQ Nation. We welcome opposing views and diverse perspectives. To submit a article, column or video, contact us here. Due to the volume of submissions received, we cannot guarantee publication.

Archives: , , , ,

Filed under: Views & Voices

2 more reader comments:

  1. The shooting incident should not keep us from demanding that the guard stop working for a hate group (and I hasten to add, that LGBTers are not the FRC’s only victims; it also hate-mongers and incites against Muslims, for example). The blood of gay bashing victims is dripping off of the FRC guard’s fingers. The FRC has as a board member Robert George, founder and mastermind of NOM. Both of these groups act very aggressively to keep “sexual orientation” and “gender identity and expression” off of school anti-bullying policies. They also intentionally spread hateful disinformation against LGBTers in schools, perpetuating climates of fear, intimidation and violence against gay students. It is still the case in most US school districts that LGBT students spend their school days living in fear. It is still the case in most US school districts that an anti-gay bully can slam a gay student up against a locker, yell “Fag!” at him, and then face no penalties. You do not have to go to Nebraska or Texas to witness that happening. Kardin Ulysse was bullied on the basis of sexual orientation in Brooklyn; the last attack left him blind in one eye, as his attackers yelled “Fucking faggot!” at him. The FRC guard is earning his living off of a hate group that perpetuates these cruel and inhumane conditions for LGBT students in most US schools. The blood of gay bashing victims is dripping off of his fingers. Those of us who long have called for gun control legislation continue to do so — the Republican-led FRC hasn’t made a peep about that. The guard is abetting evil now, just as he was before. I demand that the guard resign from the Family Research Council.

    Posted on Wednesday, August 22, 2012 at 6:19am
  2. Well I hate to say it religions under the God of Abraham (christian base, muslim base and catholic base) have really only created violence. Even the places they have missioned turn out to be violent against the people they areyold to despise.

    Posted on Wednesday, August 22, 2012 at 6:23am