Follow breaking news @lgbtqnation
Emily Dievendorf

Views & Voices

Michigan bill would allow counseling students to refuse LGBT patients

Monday, June 18, 2012

Last week, extremists in the Michigan Legislature made passage of House Bill 5040, or what I like to call the “First Do Harm” bill, a major priority before breaking for the summer.

The bill would prohibit public colleges and universities from disciplining students participating in counseling, social work and psychology programs who refuse treatment to a patient based on the patient’s sexual orientation or gender identity, if the discrimination is motivated by a “sincerely held religious belief.”

Proponents of the bill insist they are merely trying to protect our constitutional right to freedom of religion.

Let me call their bluff here. The Constitution of The United States is, perhaps, the most powerful document in the history of our country. It is a document so indomitable, that when ways to wrong each other had been written into the original document, decades were needed to reverse the humiliating mistakes.

While its content may change, necessarily, over time it is hard to argue with the resilience of the document.

I harbor an intense love of our constitutional rights and am grateful that our country’s dignity and honor rests on a declaration of national values so solid that we never need to write protections for our constitution into legislation.

Legislation that contradicts the United States Constitution tends to crumble under the Constitution – in great part because offenses to constitutional rights can be challenged, as was so brilliantly planned, directly through the United States judicial system.

We don’t need to defend the Constitution so why are we entertaining this offensive legislation? Sadly, taxpayer dollars are being used to move along legislation so broad and punishing as to allow discrimination against anybody, for any reason to be justified at a person’s very moment of crisis.

People opt for professional guidance when they are at their breaking points or see that point on the horizon. Crisis is not the time to turn somebody away because something about them doesn’t fit your personal ideals.

Professional counseling, social work, and psychological standards for practice recognize the need for counselors to be trained to offer relief to everybody. Discrimination based on various categories, including age, culture, disability, ethnicity, race, religion/spirituality, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, marital status, language preference, and socioeconomic status is prohibited by national counseling standards.

To ask a university counseling program to permit a counselor in training to reject national standards for practice in the field they are being trained threatens the accreditation of that counseling program. To turn away a client based on their fitting any of the aforementioned categories does potentially irreversible damage to the client in need’s self-worth, stability, trust in the profession, and ultimately to their intrinsic ability to address personal challenges and heal.

The strength of one’s convictions alone is not justification in and of itself for any action — it is a despicable excuse for damaging another human being.

Essentially, what the Michigan House leadership worked to do last week was to create a gap in law large enough to empower our states counseling, social work, and psychology students to do HARM to clients if their own personal beliefs inspire them to do so.

We are telling students going into these important fields that they will be entitled to power that we demand other health and wellness providers abandon expressly because of their responsibility to our most vulnerable – the power to DO harm.

House Bill 5040 threatens clients seeking counseling with rejection based on their race, relationship status, and faith, or, yes, because of their sexual orientation, or perhaps because they are straight, or because they are white, or male – as long as the discrimination and harm is based on a strong belief that some characteristic about them as a client is judged to be wrong.

Michigan’s House leadership continues to show little resistance to extremist members despite a majority of Michigan residents consistently polling in favor of social justice.

The resulting political agenda translates into a destructive and malicious campaign that tells youth, the best and brightest students, skilled workers, entrepreneurs, new and cutting edge industries, and our loved ones to either “keep out or leave.”

Equality Michigan hopes that the Michigan Senate will choose to be rational – a voice of reason for the Michigan Republican Caucus and opt to not embarrass our state, again, by entertaining the kind of out of touch legislation that was brought to us in the “license to bully” earlier this year, and kill this effort to hurt Michigan Families if “first do harm” comes up for a vote.

Opinions and advice expressed in our Views & Voices columns represent the author's own views and not necessarily those of LGBTQ Nation. We welcome opposing views and diverse perspectives. To submit a article, column or video, contact us here. Due to the volume of submissions received, we cannot guarantee publication.

Archives: , , , ,

Filed under: Views & Voices

19 more reader comments:

  1. I wouldn’t want to be counseled by anyone who wasn’t LGBT friendly anyway.

    Posted on Monday, June 18, 2012 at 11:39am
  2. Booo!!!

    Posted on Monday, June 18, 2012 at 11:39am
  3. Any counselor who refuses service based on sexuality is a pretty bad counselor.

    Posted on Monday, June 18, 2012 at 11:40am
  4. RIDICULOUS!

    Posted on Monday, June 18, 2012 at 11:43am
  5. absolutely ridiculous. =_=

    Posted on Monday, June 18, 2012 at 11:46am
  6. Expect them to propose this for ER doctors next.

    Posted on Monday, June 18, 2012 at 11:47am
  7. usa is fucked

    Posted on Monday, June 18, 2012 at 11:48am
  8. Freedom of religion does never equal freedom to discriminate. One has the right to practice the religion of their choice in their own homes, that will not change. Now that doesn’t mean that this same person has the freedom to impose their own beliefs onto others since others also have that same freedom of religion and even from religion. This new bill, while trying to give more freedom to counselors to profess what should be professed in private instead of their professions is breaking this same amendment for clients/patients who also have the right to be served/helped without discrimination. Practice your delusion at home as you wish or don’t go for a profession that involves working with people.

    Posted on Monday, June 18, 2012 at 11:51am
  9. If someone wants to become a counselor, they should realize that they have to listen to EVERYTHING. You can’t pick and choose what problems you want to fix. I’m ashamed of my state.

    Posted on Monday, June 18, 2012 at 11:56am
  10. I would not want to go that kind of a counselor anyway. Someone with a mind that closed would not be effective at counseling anyone about anything. So, maybe they have the right to refuse an LGBT client…and perhaps the school providing them with their education should refuse to allow such bigots on their campuses. Clearly they are not capable of fulfilling the expectations of a coulseing student.

    Posted on Monday, June 18, 2012 at 12:05pm
  11. I am totally ashamed to live in this sick country. I cannot believe anyone could even fathom creating bills and laws against anyone who made then God? Is there any place on this earth people are loved and no discrimination exists cuz I wanna so be there!

    Posted on Monday, June 18, 2012 at 12:06pm
  12. Lets see…IF..I was a (mean) gay man who was simply spiritual, and a heart surgeon, I could deny a person(won’t say who..who didn’t have my spiritual beliefs) life saving treatment. Huge precedent..and blatant discrimination.

    Posted on Monday, June 18, 2012 at 12:09pm
  13. Seriously?!?! WTF. This makes me want to become an lgbt counselor, and help others in the community going through what I did. <3

    Posted on Monday, June 18, 2012 at 12:34pm
  14. The American Psychological Association isn’t going to have this. Universities and colleges that offer counseling psychology programs, in my humble opinion, reserve all RIGHTS to deny any student whose personal beliefs might harm their clients well-being in any way. I feel bad for these universities because they might loose their accreditation status because of this law.

    Posted on Monday, June 18, 2012 at 1:35pm
  15. I am very upset as a psychology student that they are trying to force universities to accept people even-though those people could pose a danger to their clients’s overall well-being.

    Posted on Monday, June 18, 2012 at 1:38pm
  16. After the enormous humble pie the APA swallowed in the 70′s, they would rather just kick those kids to the curb. And if youre a bigot in psychology, wtf is wrong with you?

    Posted on Monday, June 18, 2012 at 3:08pm
  17. I’m really getting tired of living in Michigan.

    Posted on Monday, June 18, 2012 at 3:24pm
  18. @ Jakie I totally agree. Those in psychology who have prejudice and or bigoted views should NOT be paychologist!

    Posted on Monday, June 18, 2012 at 4:07pm
  19. Smh. I just saw stats yesterday that LGBTs are 6xs more likely to commit suicide. That # jumps to 8 when family rejects them. Part of a counselor’s job is to NOT sit in judgement. If they can’t do that, they need another line of work!

    Posted on Monday, June 18, 2012 at 5:44pm