News (USA)

Prop 8 supporters ask for appellate review by entire U.S. 9th Circuit Court

Prop 8 supporters ask for appellate review by entire U.S. 9th Circuit Court

SAN FRANCISCO — Supporters of California’s ban on same-sex marriage are petitioning a review by the entire Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals after a three-judge panel of the court ruled the marriage ban as unconstitutional.

Charles Cooper, lead attorney for the defendants — “Protect Marriage” and “Yes On 8” — announced Tuesday that the request for an en banc review by the circuit court had been made — a process that usually takes months to be completed.

According to Chris Stoll of the National Center for Lesbian Rights, “If a party asks for en banc review, the request is sent to all of the 20-something active judges on the court. Memos are often exchanged between the judges before a vote takes place on whether to take the case en banc. If they take it, names are drawn for the panel and a whole new series of briefs are usually filed, which takes a few more months. Then they hold oral argument and issue a decision. It is really almost like starting the whole appeal all over again.”

The proponents’ decision today means that the road to a final decision on Prop 8 just got much longer.

Nonetheless, the plaintiffs’ attorneys have made it clear that they will seek to have the stay lifted, now that Prop 8 has been struck down by two separate courts.

In the Ninth Circuit’s own guidelines, the court says that an en banc rehearing should only be heard if:

1) there is a need for “uniformity” in the court’s decision,
2) the matter is a “question of exceptional importance,” or
3) the ruling “directly conflicts with an existing opinion by another court of appeals or the Supreme Court.”

Proponents of Proposition 8 are likely to argue that the case is a matter of “exceptional importance,” but they may face an uphill battle convincing a majority of the Ninth Circuit that the appeals panel’s decision needs to be reconsidered, said Stoll.

In a 2 to 1 decision, the three-judge panel ruled Feb. 7 that California’s same-sex marriage ban violated the federal constitution.

​It was, noted many attorneys working on the issue of equal rights for LGBT people, the first time a federal appeals court has issued a decision in favor of marriage equality for same-sex couples.

Don't forget to share:

Support vital LGBTQ+ journalism

Reader contributions help keep LGBTQ Nation free, so that queer people get the news they need, with stories that mainstream media often leaves out. Can you contribute today?

Cancel anytime · Proudly LGBTQ+ owned and operated

NJ Governor Chris Christie on same- sex marriage: ‘I won’t compromise’

Previous article

Maryland senate committee approves marriage equality bill

Next article