Follow breaking news @lgbtqnation

Lawsuit challenges DOMA, Veterans Affairs over denial of benefits to married same-sex couples

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

WASHINGTON – The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs’ (VA) refusal to grant equal disability benefits to an Army veteran in a same-sex marriage is a violation of the veteran’s constitutional rights, according to a federal lawsuit filed Wednesday by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) and the law firm of WilmerHale.

via; SPLC

Tracey Cooper-Harris

The suit, filed in Los Angeles on behalf of veteran Tracey Cooper-Harris and her spouse, Maggie Cooper-Harris, challenges the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and the statute that governs the VA policy.

“The government’s refusal to grant these benefits is a slap in the face to the gay and lesbian service members who put their lives on the line to protect our nation and our freedoms,” said Christine P. Sun, deputy legal director for the SPLC, in a statement.

“Especially given the recent repeal of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, it’s shocking that the federal government continues to demean Tracey’s years of service and the service of many others in this way,” said Sun.

While in the Army, Tracey reached the rank of sergeant and served in Kyrgyzstan and Kuwait in support of Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom. She received more than two dozen medals and commendations and was honorably discharged in 2003.

Five years later, she married her partner, Maggie, in Van Nuys, Calif. In 2010, she was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS), which the VA has determined is connected to her military service. There is no known cure for MS, a disabling disease that attacks the brain and central nervous system.

Tracey received disability benefits, but the VA denied her application for additional compensation to which married veterans are entitled – benefits meant to help ensure financial stability for spouses – even though her marriage is legally recognized in California. The denial also means the couple will not be permitted to be buried together in a national veteran’s cemetery.

The VA’s decision was based on its definition of a spouse, spelled out in federal law, as “a person of the opposite sex who is a wife or a husband.”

Even if the VA were to change its definition of spouse, DOMA would prevent the VA from approving the benefits because it defines marriage for all federal purposes as “a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife,” according to the SPLC.

“I dedicated 12 years of my life to serving the country I love,” Tracey said.

“I’m asking only for the same benefits the brave men and women who served beside me enjoy. By refusing to recognize our marriage, the federal government has deprived Maggie and me of the peace of mind that such benefits are meant to provide to veterans and their families.”

The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, charges that DOMA is unconstitutional because it discriminates on the basis of gender and sexual orientation. It also challenges the VA’s definition of “spouse” as discriminatory.

Via: SPLC.

Archives: , , , , , , ,

Filed under: National Headlines

3 more reader comments:

  1. mmmmmmmm : ( where is the equal rights in U.S.A ????

    Posted on Wednesday, February 1, 2012 at 8:09pm
  2. “DOMA would prevent the VA from approving the benefits because it defines marriage for all federal purposes as “a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife,”

    I don’t get it. The military does not fall under federal guidelines. They’re there own sector. When Obama added Sexual Orientation to the Federally protected from discrimination in Government positions, that didn’t repeal DOMA. So why would DOMA be any different?

    Posted on Thursday, February 2, 2012 at 1:47am
  3. Negative. The military falls under federal jurisdiction. DOM is a a federal law that prohibits the recognizing of a spousal of a homosexual couple. I mean, when they repealed DADT (military side) we didn’t even get much briefing because it didn’t really change anything. DOMA was still in place, you couldnt get BAS, BAH, family separation, really anything. If you are talking about ten years, that’s over a hundred thousand dollars.

    Posted on Thursday, February 2, 2012 at 8:53pm