<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CBS rejects gay-themed Super Bowl ads; GLAAD calls for explanation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lgbtqnation.com/2010/01/mancrunch-go-daddy-get-rejection-slips-for-gay-themed-super-bowl-ads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lgbtqnation.com/2010/01/mancrunch-go-daddy-get-rejection-slips-for-gay-themed-super-bowl-ads/</link>
	<description>News, Opinions, Arts and Culture  &#124;  The Nation&#039;s LGBTQ News Magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:04:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<meta xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex,follow" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynn</title>
		<link>http://www.lgbtqnation.com/2010/01/mancrunch-go-daddy-get-rejection-slips-for-gay-themed-super-bowl-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-1005</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lgbtqnation.com/?p=5573#comment-1005</guid>
		<description>as a proud member of the LGBT community (and as anything but a prude) i can say without bias that the first commercial was a tad inappropriate for the Superbowl. Though, NOT because of the gay content; i wouldn&#039;t want to see a comercial with straight people making out either. though i do believe it was unfair of CBS to reject it specifically because of the queer factor and i do believe that if it HAD been straight people, the commercial would&#039;ve been OKed with little more than a second thought. 
the second comercial, however, i found nothing wrong with and i do believe that Go Daddy has put out many commercials far more &quot;offensive&quot; than that one</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as a proud member of the LGBT community (and as anything but a prude) i can say without bias that the first commercial was a tad inappropriate for the Superbowl. Though, NOT because of the gay content; i wouldn't want to see a comercial with straight people making out either. though i do believe it was unfair of CBS to reject it specifically because of the queer factor and i do believe that if it HAD been straight people, the commercial would've been OKed with little more than a second thought.<br />
the second comercial, however, i found nothing wrong with and i do believe that Go Daddy has put out many commercials far more "offensive" than that one</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.006 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 442/446 objects using memcached

Served from: www.lgbtqnation.com @ 2012-02-08 23:10:17 -->
