<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: CBS rejects gay-themed Super Bowl ads; GLAAD calls for explanation</title> <atom:link href="http://www.lgbtqnation.com/2010/01/mancrunch-go-daddy-get-rejection-slips-for-gay-themed-super-bowl-ads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.lgbtqnation.com/2010/01/mancrunch-go-daddy-get-rejection-slips-for-gay-themed-super-bowl-ads/</link> <description>A mix of news, opinions, arts and culture — about and for today&#039;s Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer community</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 06:57:25 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator><meta
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex,follow" /> <item><title>By: Lynn</title><link>http://www.lgbtqnation.com/2010/01/mancrunch-go-daddy-get-rejection-slips-for-gay-themed-super-bowl-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-1005</link> <dc:creator>Lynn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:54:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.lgbtqnation.com/?p=5573#comment-1005</guid> <description>as a proud member of the LGBT community (and as anything but a prude) i can say without bias that the first commercial was a tad inappropriate for the Superbowl. Though, NOT because of the gay content; i wouldn&#039;t want to see a comercial with straight people making out either. though i do believe it was unfair of CBS to reject it specifically because of the queer factor and i do believe that if it HAD been straight people, the commercial would&#039;ve been OKed with little more than a second thought.
the second comercial, however, i found nothing wrong with and i do believe that Go Daddy has put out many commercials far more &quot;offensive&quot; than that one</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as a proud member of the LGBT community (and as anything but a prude) i can say without bias that the first commercial was a tad inappropriate for the Superbowl. Though, NOT because of the gay content; i wouldn&#8217;t want to see a comercial with straight people making out either. though i do believe it was unfair of CBS to reject it specifically because of the queer factor and i do believe that if it HAD been straight people, the commercial would&#8217;ve been OKed with little more than a second thought.<br
/> the second comercial, however, i found nothing wrong with and i do believe that Go Daddy has put out many commercials far more &#8220;offensive&#8221; than that one</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 3/12 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk
Object Caching 272/275 objects using disk

Served from: www.lgbtqnation.com @ 2010-09-06 17:53:02 -->