Follow breaking news @lgbtqnation

Lawmakers introduce ‘Respect for Marriage’ bill to overturn DOMA

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

Respect for Marriage Press ConferenceHouse Democrats are mobilizing around a new bill that would overturn the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, which defined marriage as between a man and a woman and relieved states of recognizing same-sex marriage performed in other states.

Leading the effort is Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-New York), who said that when the law was signed by former President Bill Clinton 13 years ago, same-sex marriage was hypothetical, but today tens of thousands of gay and lesbian couples are legally married under the laws of four states.

The repeal, called the The Respect for Marriage Act, would allow all legally married same-sex couples access to what advocates say are more than 1,000 marital benefits under federal law.

In his remarks at a press conference Tuesday, Nadler said that same-sex couples “have debunked the baseless myth that their marriages would somehow undermine or destroy theinstitution of marriage.”

The true harm of the law, he said, “is the harm it causes same-sex couples and their families.”

“Today we celebrate the first step to overturning the defense of marriage act and sending that ugly law into the history books where it belongs,” said Nadler, who also stressed that both President Barack Obama and Clinton are in support of the Respect for Marriage Act.

Jared Polis (D-Colorado), who co-chairs the LGBT Equality Caucus stated that DOMA was “a law that should of never been on our books” and “an embarrassment for our country.” Polis is the first openly gay man to be elected to Congress as a non-incumbent.

The new bill already has 90 co-sponsors, though House leaders are skeptical that the timing is favorable to the cause. Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) told the Washington Blade that he saw little hope of the law passing “in the near term,” and recommended the courts as a better option to overturn DOMA.

While Obama has expressed support for repealing the ’96 law, he has yet to make any moves toward doing so.

More at the Washington Blade.

Archives: , ,

Filed under: National Headlines

1 more reader comments:

  1. My greatest concern is the timing of such a legislative approach. It would almost seem as if the Democrats like shooting themselves in the foot. While no one can foretell the outcome of an election introducing such controversial legislation just weeks before an election could galvanize equality opponents to come out in masses and work to upset re-election campaigns or even try to shift the balance of power to the GOP or Tea Party wingnuts – two outcomes which would prove to be absolutely disastrous for the U.S. right about now.

    Posted on Sunday, October 10, 2010 at 12:32pm